Teslas need a weight in the drivers seat to operate I thought, and don't they turn off if you take your hands off the wheels now? The first would necessarily mean they cannot operate without a human monitoring the vehicle.
There's subtlety there, maybe CA DMV could make a case for it but I believe Tesla would win on that point.
These cars are in fact equipped with technology that has the capability of operating without the human being there. That fact that Uber mandated a person had to sit in there and monitor it isn't the point, these vehicles have that capability, and thus do fall under this law.
That's why they just got their registrations revoked.
When you have a budget and a timeline, you go for the use cases you can hit within the budget and timeline.
For everything else there's some dude/gal out there in the open source community filling the void. Not any different than the specialized stuff you mentioned really, other than the fact that you get charged out your ass for it. Your browser is free last I checked.
Me either, because all of that happens in the span of one second for me.
And yeah, all of those thumbnails are a local cache of the last time you looked at that page.
Only plugin I use is AdBlock, Chrome on Win7 (Chrome on Win10 at home is the same). It's just a bizarre deal because I've been really happy with how Chrome works, but then you see these reports of 'it takes forever to load a new tab' and I have no idea what would actually cause that to happen, and I can't see it actually being an issue with the Browser itself.
And each one of them doing background work just like a regular application would, at least nowadays. Ask the idiots designing the pages and loading in a bunch of crap, not the browser writer.
If I were running 300 programs on my OS sucking up 100% of the CPU would you call me daft? Sure as shit you would.
Do you really, honestly think that's the standard user? I mean, really, come on now, think about who uses the web and what they're doing with it.
I didn't say that this use case never happens, I've said it's probably not your general user. I'll stand by that, what you're doing is now probably considered 'edge case'.
Hey he could surprise me, and I'll be the first to say 'hey good on that guy'.
But it defies common sense. Nobody in government deliberately destroys their own interests, for starters.
Secondly, the 'every business in the same line faces the same costs' isn't true, because they're not all getting their material, labor, what have you from the same countries. My best guess, is there will be specific winners and losers here, mainly those that are 'friends' of the administration. So basically the status quo, which is why I say 'you got conned'.
'And with ten or fifteen open tabs it eventually becomes sluggish as hell.'
I don't think that's the standard use case for testing, nor should it be. What the hell are you doing with that many tabs open.
"Unfortunately, modern browsers are so stupid that they reload all the tabs when you restart them. Which takes ages if you have a hundred of tabs."
Again, good lord. Hundreds of tabs? What are you even doing.
As to refresh, I think that's become a user expectation that you see the most recent information when you pull up a tab. Having to manually do it isn't something a standard user is going to do.
Maybe what you're looking for is to have 'power user' settings in the browser, so you can keep your hundred tabs open.
This is just a test really, and it'll be irrelevant until it's not. Egg on their face and what not.
When they can ramp this up to hit something important that's not air gapped, I wonder if you'll still be on the high horse saying it's 'vandalism'.
DDoS doesn't exist to generate money, it's used to create chaos.
1.) 1km is not a huge section of road.
2.) This is a prototype.
Except for the whole NIMBY attitude of people in the countryside regarding upright solar panels, and the whole 'land rights' thing.
Cost is NOT the only issue here.
Climate effects weather patterns?
I thought that was obvious by now.
"haven't been any hurricanes for 10 years"
Funniest shit I've read all week. Couldn't even bother to go to www.google.com to verify that one before you dumped it out there on the internet?
Oh no, they used a metaphor in a post. FUCKING BURN THAT GUY.
The title of the fucking post is about weather, the content of the post is about weather, so what are you even on about.
Teslas need a weight in the drivers seat to operate I thought, and don't they turn off if you take your hands off the wheels now? The first would necessarily mean they cannot operate without a human monitoring the vehicle.
There's subtlety there, maybe CA DMV could make a case for it but I believe Tesla would win on that point.
I think Uber needs to hire new lawyers.
These cars are in fact equipped with technology that has the capability of operating without the human being there. That fact that Uber mandated a person had to sit in there and monitor it isn't the point, these vehicles have that capability, and thus do fall under this law.
That's why they just got their registrations revoked.
When you have a budget and a timeline, you go for the use cases you can hit within the budget and timeline.
For everything else there's some dude/gal out there in the open source community filling the void. Not any different than the specialized stuff you mentioned really, other than the fact that you get charged out your ass for it. Your browser is free last I checked.
Me either, because all of that happens in the span of one second for me.
And yeah, all of those thumbnails are a local cache of the last time you looked at that page.
Only plugin I use is AdBlock, Chrome on Win7 (Chrome on Win10 at home is the same). It's just a bizarre deal because I've been really happy with how Chrome works, but then you see these reports of 'it takes forever to load a new tab' and I have no idea what would actually cause that to happen, and I can't see it actually being an issue with the Browser itself.
There's a way to turn them off. I don't need my phone that badly.
And each one of them doing background work just like a regular application would, at least nowadays. Ask the idiots designing the pages and loading in a bunch of crap, not the browser writer.
If I were running 300 programs on my OS sucking up 100% of the CPU would you call me daft? Sure as shit you would.
I'm trying to figure out how opening a new tab in Chrome takes a long time and seems to be some kinda of 'scourge we must deal with'.
It's instant for me, always has been.
I don't own a smart phone so I can't comment really. This article seemed to be based on desktop browsers, different cases to consider.
Do you really, honestly think that's the standard user? I mean, really, come on now, think about who uses the web and what they're doing with it.
I didn't say that this use case never happens, I've said it's probably not your general user. I'll stand by that, what you're doing is now probably considered 'edge case'.
I do that, but to a much smaller scale. And I suspect that a large proportion of users operate in a similar way.
Deep dive research with 100+ open tabs is not a standard use case for web browsing, it's just not.
Hey he could surprise me, and I'll be the first to say 'hey good on that guy'.
But it defies common sense. Nobody in government deliberately destroys their own interests, for starters.
Secondly, the 'every business in the same line faces the same costs' isn't true, because they're not all getting their material, labor, what have you from the same countries. My best guess, is there will be specific winners and losers here, mainly those that are 'friends' of the administration. So basically the status quo, which is why I say 'you got conned'.
'And with ten or fifteen open tabs it eventually becomes sluggish as hell.'
I don't think that's the standard use case for testing, nor should it be. What the hell are you doing with that many tabs open.
"Unfortunately, modern browsers are so stupid that they reload all the tabs when you restart them. Which takes ages if you have a hundred of tabs."
Again, good lord. Hundreds of tabs? What are you even doing.
As to refresh, I think that's become a user expectation that you see the most recent information when you pull up a tab. Having to manually do it isn't something a standard user is going to do.
Maybe what you're looking for is to have 'power user' settings in the browser, so you can keep your hundred tabs open.
https://www.penny-arcade.com/c...
Never ceases to be true, at least to me.
They don't need to. Accident statistics can be generated by the governmental regulators or insurance companies.
How the vehicles do in a controlled test is irrelevant, so we won't know until these are actually out in the wild.
So you think, somehow, that Trump is going to implement laws that will make his businesses less profitable?
All you guys in the rust belt bought into the big con, hook, line, and sinker.
It's a pretty picture, but not realistic.
If you can have accidents then you can have fatalities.
" Is it something intentionally crafted to induce seizures in epilepsy sufferers?"
That's exactly what it was, so yeah, pretty certain you can show 'intent to harm', thus assault.
The Human was driving it at the time, so yeah, there's that.
Was just operating like any other taxi driver I've ever seen.