Slashdot Mirror


User: Delphinios

Delphinios's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
107
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 107

  1. Re:Power surge? on 9/9/99: News? Nein! · · Score: 1

    No it was those aliens temporarially knocking out communications in your area so they could abduct and implant people with bugs.

    Either that or some "computer expert" finally found out where the "on" switch was..

  2. Re:Do some moderators smoke crack? on 9/9/99: News? Nein! · · Score: 0

    Not sure. I personally found this slightly funny.
    Moderation Advice: comment +2, moderator's Karma -2.

  3. Re:Proof that HotMail CGI Bug known about since 19 on Update: MS Says Hotmail "Security Issue" Resolved · · Score: 1
    another interesting thing, i tried that URL,


    http://www.hotmail.com/cgi-bin/password.cgi?logi n=username&curmbox=active


    and all i got was an "Internal server error" message, not an "invalid password" or anything similiar.. Makes me wonder, vaguly, if there is still something to this bug.. I doubt it, but might be worth looking into.

    Server Name: lc3-lfd63.law5.hotmail.com
    Your Browser (User Agent) = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 95)
    Last Task (ScriptName) = /home/httpd0/cgi-bin/password.cgi
    RequestMethod = GET
    QueryString = login=ACCOUNTNAME&curmbox=active


    EOF

  4. Proof that HotMail CGI Bug known about since 1998. on Update: MS Says Hotmail "Security Issue" Resolved · · Score: 1
    I was running through various places, and i ran across this bit. Thought it is rather interesting..

    I am quoting from
    http://www.w3.org/Security/Faq/wwwsf4.html

    "HotMail
    The CGI scripts that run the popular HotMail e-mail system use a flawed security system that allows unauthorized individuals to break into user's e-mail accounts and read their mail. This problem is known to affect the version of HotMail that was in place as of December 1998. For further information, see these links:
    http://email.miningco.com/library/nus/bl120898-1 .htm
    http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Lab/66 01/shailesh/hotmail.html "


    Specifically the first link..


    Quoting from that link..


    "Hotmail Accounts Easily Accessed by Hackers
    Hotmail is still extremely vulnerable to hackers who try to gain access to other people's email accounts, Shailesh Govekar and Krishnan VenkataRaman, software engineers at Lisec Software, have found out.

    It may be easier than you think for other people (malicious or not) to read your (Hot)mail. They do not even need your password. All it takes is a URL and the user whose email they want to read to be logged in.

    Sneaking the right URL out of Hotmail's database is easy and can be done at any time with only the user name of the account-to-be-hacked.

    On their Web site Govekar and VenkataRaman describe the necessary steps in detail. A URL looking like http://www.hotmail.com/cgi-bin/password.cgi?login= username&curmbox=active will reveal the URL that can be used to access the account belonging to username.

    If, for example, we insert "exhibitio" as the username, the URL is http://www.hotmail.com/cgi-bin/password.cgi?login= exhibitio&curmbox=active. The source (or, in Netscape, the "page info") reveal the URL to access "exhibitio"'s mail if the user is currently logged in to Hotmail: it is the first string beginning with "http", in our sample case http://207.82.252.251/cgi-bin//start/exhibitio/209 .185.130.45_d436.

    The problem is that Hotmail uses neither HTTP authentication nor cookies to ensure an account is accessed only from the computer that originally logged in to the account. "


    Now, Lets take this evidence against Microsoft's Pr crap..


    EOF



  5. Re:Damn the Internet! on 30th Birthday of the Internet · · Score: 2

    Heh here's an idea. stop spending 12 hours a day on the internet.

    That just might solve a problem or two.

    Don't Blaim the Object of your addiction for your own inability to solve your problems.

    And finally. get some help. or you are gonna have more problems in the future. There _ARE_ 12 step programs out there. don't ask me where, search yahoo for "internet addiction 12 step" or something. mabey you'll get laid once in a while, after you get 'cured'

    EOF

  6. Re:Sexual Harassment on Ask Slashdot: Privacy in the Workplace · · Score: 1

    Ok. I Have an idea. If someone is downloading porn and keeping it to themselves, what is the problem? if someone else happens to see it, and find it offensive, then the problem starts. i think, if reported, then the person who has the porn (or other offensive content) should be warned, and if reported again, diciplinary action be performed. this would root out many privacy issues and make the overall situation better in the long run. It really pisses me off when someone finds something even slightly, then without trying to rectify the situation, immediatly cry out "LAWSUIT". This is ludicrus and plain stupid. If you are going to monitor the people's accounts, definately warn them. to do otherwise would be wrong IMHO, though it is still an invasion of privacy.

  7. Re:Or... on FCC Makes Wiretapping Easier for Cops · · Score: 1

    This does not give >them a right to tap your phone lines. they may tap your lines now, but thats only one step away from putting bugs in the house. Then what? You're only stupid if you don't discuss your secret agenda in a cornfied at midnight, under a cover so the spy satellites can't see you? hmm...