"He hated all things about government which is not a right wing view. "
More than that- what he hated was that the government was not doing more socialist stuff. I sure wish those who would label him a right winger, would find a quote of his, any quote, which displays any of the values that are advocated by the political right.
Whoops- lost track of the context. My apologies. My challenge is obviously directed at the guy who wrote the "Many of the articles on the site border on disgraceful racism" line.
"Many of the articles on the site border on disgraceful racism "
If that is the case, it should not take you more than a moment or two to go there, and get some links, and post them here to back up your claim?
Let's see the disgraceful racism in the articles posted there.
I will be interested in seeing if you can do it. Heck, I bet you can't even find any disgraceful racism (in the replies to articles) that are not met with an overwhelming repudiation by the posters on the threads (we get trolls, just like any posting board does).
"And it seems that if you scream, shout and intimidate people in an attempt to influence a national election regardless of the vote, it's free speech. When you act annoying on a conservative web forum, it's illegal and you get taken to court. "
There is a difference between being annoying, and attempting denial of service attacks. The former just make themselves look silly. The latter can prevent the legal conduct of a business or site.
(And as for the election, you should be more frightened at the thought of nobody screaming bloody murder if a group of people tried to take the counting of ballots out of the view of the public, behind closed doors. What did they have to hide? What were they willing to do behind closed doors, that they were unwilling to do out in the open?)
"as a site of intolerant RWM's"
Gee, as opposed to all those tolerant other types?
I use Free Republic all the time. And to say that the site is full of intolerant people is like saying that here is full of intolerant types- yeah, there are a few, but the overwhelming majority are not.
Generally, I have come to see that there is much more intolerance generated by the political left anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
More than that- what he hated was that the government was not doing more socialist stuff. I sure wish those who would label him a right winger, would find a quote of his, any quote, which displays any of the values that are advocated by the political right.
Whoops- lost track of the context. My apologies. My challenge is obviously directed at the guy who wrote the "Many of the articles on the site border on disgraceful racism" line.
If that is the case, it should not take you more than a moment or two to go there, and get some links, and post them here to back up your claim?
Let's see the disgraceful racism in the articles posted there.
I will be interested in seeing if you can do it. Heck, I bet you can't even find any disgraceful racism (in the replies to articles) that are not met with an overwhelming repudiation by the posters on the threads (we get trolls, just like any posting board does).
When the left starts doing that?
They started that the day he was caught.
There is a difference between being annoying, and attempting denial of service attacks. The former just make themselves look silly. The latter can prevent the legal conduct of a business or site.
(And as for the election, you should be more frightened at the thought of nobody screaming bloody murder if a group of people tried to take the counting of ballots out of the view of the public, behind closed doors. What did they have to hide? What were they willing to do behind closed doors, that they were unwilling to do out in the open?)
I use Free Republic all the time. And to say that the site is full of intolerant people is like saying that here is full of intolerant types- yeah, there are a few, but the overwhelming majority are not.
Generally, I have come to see that there is much more intolerance generated by the political left anyway.