The article does not say explicitly, although it does imply (by use of the word "judgement" instead of "fines") that this may have been a _civil_ case, not a criminal one (yes, the federal government can be a party to civil cases too.)
If this were the case, the Supreme court decision about heat sensors is probably irrelevant, as the rules of evidence are greatly relaxed for civil cases.
Short answer = yes.
For two of our standard products, my company uses a 1U chassis with a passive backplane that accepts
3 PCI slots (one of which is used for a SBC) giving two free PCI slots for custom cards.
There is also mounting space for 2 hard drives.
Unfortunately, these are custom built for our company, and not generally available. They also suffer from being somewhat loud (6 fans!)
If you have a need for a (medium to large) volume of such products, you could certainly commission the design of such things.
We also have a 1U Intel server chassis out in the lab that will allow one PCI card (although as it already has dual P3, dual ethernet, video, dual USB, etc. on the main board, I don't know how much else you'd need (at least, if you're building a server.)
Slashdot Mirror
Then what does the "L" stand for?
-1, Troll (self-moderated)
If this were the case, the Supreme court decision about heat sensors is probably irrelevant, as the rules of evidence are greatly relaxed for civil cases.
If you have a need for a (medium to large) volume of such products, you could certainly commission the design of such things.
We also have a 1U Intel server chassis out in the lab that will allow one PCI card (although as it already has dual P3, dual ethernet, video, dual USB, etc. on the main board, I don't know how much else you'd need (at least, if you're building a server.)