> If they disagree with you, they obviously are being paid to promote that point.
Unfortunately when fighting against such business practises becoming the status quo, when they happen to have a whole lot of financial and legal clout this is especially true: If you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem.
That is why people feel the need to scream at those who publicly defend these organisations - it might not be logical or even very smart, but it's always going to happen. Perhaps if you don't feel strongly about it, one way or the other, you might like to keep your thoughts to yourself and let the stakeholders fight their battles without you in the way ?
That's not a demand of couse - do what you like - but just a suggestion that there might be an answer to your (rhetorical ?) question.
Slashdot Mirror
> If they disagree with you, they obviously are being paid to promote that point.
Unfortunately when fighting against such business practises becoming the status quo, when they happen to have a whole lot of financial and legal clout this is especially true: If you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem.
That is why people feel the need to scream at those who publicly defend these organisations - it might not be logical or even very smart, but it's always going to happen. Perhaps if you don't feel strongly about it, one way or the other, you might like to keep your thoughts to yourself and let the stakeholders fight their battles without you in the way ?
That's not a demand of couse - do what you like - but just a suggestion that there might be an answer to your (rhetorical ?) question.