not sure about the "you are going to get inffected if you are browsing porn sites"...if an attacker is already performing an arp spoofing attack he can easily redirect (dnsspoof) any web traffic to a web site under his control so under this scenario, any vulnerable explorer browser may get exploited regardless of the site it is visiting (it could be CNN's, whitehouse.gov, etc.)...
...but your hostages are already dead. Mourn for them, but don't pay off their kidnappers. That's stupid. That's Reagan-stupid. Ten million bucks buys a lot more kidnappings and suicide bombs...
My dear Mr. We-the-gringos-do-not-negotiate, I really pray to God that never in your live you be in a situation where you daughter o son or mother or father is the subject of the "negotiation".
If you can still hold on to your argument in a situation like this, good for you, if you don't, will all due respect, keep the bullshit for your self.
...although diplomacy requires the Bush admin never to mention that...
...anybody else is noticing the eminent self-contradiction in the previous sentence? or is it just me and my recently acquired caffeine-free environment...
I don't know and could be completely wrong about it, but this campaign of privacy concerns about the way Gmail is going to scan our mails and how evil its is, seems to me more like a kind of Yahoo! and MSN and who knows who other else fighting for their survival...why would I pay 20 o 30 something dollar a year to upgrade my Inbox to 25/30MB when I can have 1GB for free?
And by the way, isn't Yahoo! or MSN already scanning every single of our mails in search of antivirus and antispam? No privacy concerns here? Am I missing something here?
Good question, and maybe a reference that may be of some use for you is the "Exploiting Software" book by Hoglund and McGraw (it was for me)...very good book describing why software errors ocurs...they basically states that because the "input space" of a program is so big, there can be no quality assurance process that can meassure how the software will behave under all the different sets of posibly inputs so basically what we get is that all the software (it doesn't matter if it is comercial or opensource) goes into production only partially tested...
Slashdot Mirror
not sure about the "you are going to get inffected if you are browsing porn sites"...if an attacker is already performing an arp spoofing attack he can easily redirect (dnsspoof) any web traffic to a web site under his control so under this scenario, any vulnerable explorer browser may get exploited regardless of the site it is visiting (it could be CNN's, whitehouse.gov, etc.)...
"...FP Magazine is reporting that despite the fact that Iraq has been a sovereign nation for some 15 months..."
uh? iraq was founded as a sovereign nation on 1932, thats more than 73 years, not just 15 months, ago! pls check your facts...
in fact 15 months ago Iraq was invaded and by definition an "invaded nation" could not be called a "sovereign nation"...
"...Yeah, things were much better when the legal system was the torture and execution of anyone who looked at the leadership funny..."
are you talking about iraq's legal system from 2003-2005?
...but your hostages are already dead. Mourn for them, but don't pay off their kidnappers. That's stupid. That's Reagan-stupid. Ten million bucks buys a lot more kidnappings and suicide bombs...
My dear Mr. We-the-gringos-do-not-negotiate, I really pray to God that never in your live you be in a situation where you daughter o son or mother or father is the subject of the "negotiation".
If you can still hold on to your argument in a situation like this, good for you, if you don't, will all due respect, keep the bullshit for your self.
...although diplomacy requires the Bush admin never to mention that...
...anybody else is noticing the eminent self-contradiction in the previous sentence? or is it just me and my recently acquired caffeine-free environment...
I don't know and could be completely wrong about it, but this campaign of privacy concerns about the way Gmail is going to scan our mails and how evil its is, seems to me more like a kind of Yahoo! and MSN and who knows who other else fighting for their survival...why would I pay 20 o 30 something dollar a year to upgrade my Inbox to 25/30MB when I can have 1GB for free?
And by the way, isn't Yahoo! or MSN already scanning every single of our mails in search of antivirus and antispam? No privacy concerns here? Am I missing something here?
Good question, and maybe a reference that may be of some use for you is the "Exploiting Software" book by Hoglund and McGraw (it was for me)...very good book describing why software errors ocurs...they basically states that because the "input space" of a program is so big, there can be no quality assurance process that can meassure how the software will behave under all the different sets of posibly inputs so basically what we get is that all the software (it doesn't matter if it is comercial or opensource) goes into production only partially tested...
higly recomended book...
"Let the dogs bark, Sancho, it's a
sign we're going in the right direction."