User: The_Runcible

Re:proof?

On: Another Look at Life On The Jovian moons

s/than/then; //slap

Re:proof?

On: Another Look at Life On The Jovian moons

Let me guess, you read at +1? well than, pay attention now, see that 'Re:' in the subject line? that means that the post is a "Reply". Do you understand now?

I want a Goverment job!

On: IBM Gets 30 Days Community Service

$121.43 to wash some paint off of a sidewalk?

I bet you could do at least 3 an hour, so that's $364.29 an hour, or more than most lawyers make!

Re:Art Imitates Life

On: Review: A Knight's Tale

I really liked that, and started browsing your site. Very cool suff.

BTW, the correct way to kill someone is to use a *runcible*.

And the W3C stamp means what?

On: XML Schema a W3C Recommendation

Just look at how unified html has become!

Re:The problem with open source languages...

On: Apocalypse 2

I understand your frustration with having to relearn the syntax, but I believe that if the best thing to do is to byte the bullet as early as possible and fix the flaws.

Well, that's if you want to call this early. There are many prgramers who have picked up perl through web application programing etc. When they dive into their next project which happens to be in perl6, with diferent sintax in some cases, they will run into problems when editing and understanding the code.

Is it better to have to somtimes think a bit to 'work around' flaws in the languge, or to change the languge, which makes everyone have to 'think a bit' to do anything?!?

I was in the same situation.

On: Altering a Cisco 675 for use on DMT DSL Connection?

I searched for a long time, I haven't found any info, so I think we are SOL. Just try to sell it for the best price you can get . . .