Slashdot Mirror


User: lameluke

lameluke's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3

  1. Re:Great, more fragmentation on New Kernel 2.4 Development Branch (-mjc) · · Score: 1

    Linus has made some comments relevant to this;
    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=1 00 948142802025&w=2

    Here's a tiny summary;
    - competition keeps people honest.
    - Different taste.
    - Different goals.
    - And imperfect patch retention.

  2. They can just check the access.log on Advertisers Escalate Banner Ad War · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This sounds strange to me. Can they really include something in the download (Java or JS, I assume) that detects whether an ad picture has been downloaded or not?
    They can just check the access.log - however they will never know if it actually has been displayed.

  3. Schmidt reverse enginered it? Don't think so.. on IP Theft in the Linux Kernel · · Score: 1

    Take a look here:

    http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=li nu x.kernel.Pine.LNX.4.10.10012292247350.15613-100000 %40master.linux-ide.org&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3D andre%2Bpromise%2Bata%2Bbsd%26hl%3Den%26group%3Dml ist.linux.kernel%26rnum%3D1%26selm%3Dlinux.kernel. Pine.LNX.4.10.10012292247350.15613-100000%2540mast er.linux-ide.org


    ..."It is my understanding that he got all of the info on how Highpoint lays out the geometry of the array directly from Highpoint, and that they were "very forthcoming" with whateveri nformation that the FreeBSD team asked for."

    This was December last year..

    I'm very dissapointed that this wasn't simply solved by a mail from S. Schmidt to Linus Torvalds or Andre Hedrick -- look at all the bad press you've made; for BSD, for Linux and - for Open Source.

    :(