well if you start charging SPAMMers, how long before they start charging regular users? the spammers are paying an ISP for internet connectivity, just like you already
congress is a group of people who don't understand technology. why are you asking them to make laws involving it? I get tons of SPAM too, but i let it build up for a coupla days then delete it......3 minutes....stop crying, you, babies...
but is it illegal to use the "wanna fuck" method of picking up chicks? or should it be? it is just socially unacceptable, same with spam, i and i assume most others, ignore (sometimes get mad at)the spam, just as the ladies in your scenario do.... do we want to start fining people who are rude? not in my country where speech is still free....kinda..
the bill would allow fair business use of e-mail, correct?
spam must work, otherwise it wouldnt be in these companies' best interest to mail it out. so if it is in fact bringing in new customers for these businesses, shouldn't that be allowed.
well if you start charging SPAMMers, how long before they start charging regular users? the spammers are paying an ISP for internet connectivity, just like you already
congress is a group of people who don't understand technology. why are you asking them to make laws involving it? I get tons of SPAM too, but i let it build up for a coupla days then delete it......3 minutes....stop crying, you, babies...
but is it illegal to use the "wanna fuck" method of picking up chicks? or should it be? it is just socially unacceptable, same with spam, i and i assume most others, ignore (sometimes get mad at)the spam, just as the ladies in your scenario do.... do we want to start fining people who are rude? not in my country where speech is still free....kinda..
wait....are you coming on to me?
the bill would allow fair business use of e-mail, correct? spam must work, otherwise it wouldnt be in these companies' best interest to mail it out. so if it is in fact bringing in new customers for these businesses, shouldn't that be allowed.