I don't believe the President can make new taxes or spend new money without Congressional approval, which pretty much means do anything majorly important.
The article mentions (fairly far down) that the applicant's written authorization is required. If the (an example) loan applicant has provided written authorization to a bank to look up his/her salary, then how is this a compromise of the loan applicant's privacy?
Slashdot Mirror
I don't believe the President can make new taxes or spend new money without Congressional approval, which pretty much means do anything majorly important.
The article mentions (fairly far down) that the applicant's written authorization is required. If the (an example) loan applicant has provided written authorization to a bank to look up his/her salary, then how is this a compromise of the loan applicant's privacy?