I'm don't on my 'domain' here but :
I'm sure as hell gonna try to give my IP packets high data priopority.
Making them packets from isochronic applications should also do the trick but they will trash iso-packets that remain in a queue too long... soo resend those , no ???
This means fast, very fast communication for those that can actually write something (and scriptkiddy's... )
It's an idea,... geeky but still just an idea...
Computers can be o/c'ed, because there's a safety margin in time between clocks and the time it takes for one 'round' through the flip-flops, etc... obviously no?
Vendors also use it to buy them time and sell computers more (aside the safety purposes)... and that's the real reason why you should o/c.
Note : Because schematics become different in a newer faster CPU (for faster 'rounds'), computational speed may not have increased by the same factor as the clock ( while o/c'ing does tend to do that, obviously no? ).
And :
It's always very relaxing and good for the stress-full o/c workaholic to have a warmwater-aquarium, next to the computer... mjummy gummy...
You should state it as :
I can't see THE LIGHT (would be faster than audio or even RF but what is actually new here?).
But I think you're absolutely right about all the rest.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm don't on my 'domain' here but : I'm sure as hell gonna try to give my IP packets high data priopority. Making them packets from isochronic applications should also do the trick but they will trash iso-packets that remain in a queue too long... soo resend those , no ??? This means fast, very fast communication for those that can actually write something (and scriptkiddy's ... )
It's an idea, ... geeky but still just an idea...
Computers can be o/c'ed, because there's a safety margin in time between clocks and the time it takes for one 'round' through the flip-flops, etc... obviously no? Vendors also use it to buy them time and sell computers more (aside the safety purposes)... and that's the real reason why you should o/c. Note : Because schematics become different in a newer faster CPU (for faster 'rounds'), computational speed may not have increased by the same factor as the clock ( while o/c'ing does tend to do that, obviously no? ). And : It's always very relaxing and good for the stress-full o/c workaholic to have a warmwater-aquarium, next to the computer... mjummy gummy ...
You should state it as : I can't see THE LIGHT (would be faster than audio or even RF but what is actually new here?). But I think you're absolutely right about all the rest.
My invention : No machine does exactly the same as this machine, only much faster than light. It's a big joke I think.