Slashdot Mirror


User: thesmos

thesmos's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Re:Theoretical peak of the LLNL Xeon cluster? on Big Mac achieves around 14 TFlops with 128 Nodes · · Score: 1

    Thunder Looks Expensive.

  2. Re:2.4 GHz on Slashback: Grammy, Sirius, Levies · · Score: 1

    I have tried channel 1 (low end of the spectrum) and channel 11 (high end). They both seemed equally bad. Of course my WAP (an Airport base station) is less than 10 feet from the microwave. One of these days I will try moving it into a room other than the kitchen.

  3. 2.4 GHz on Slashback: Grammy, Sirius, Levies · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microwave ovens also run in the 2.4 GHz range and they cause all kinds of 802.11 interference. At my house using the microwave kills my WLAN. Are they trying to get rid of my nuker too?

  4. Re:AT&T selling linksys equip on Cable Co's Want More Control Over Your Network · · Score: 1

    They even give you a deal on the linksys:
    http://att.broadband.com/specials.htm
    Only 80 bucks when you sign up.

  5. Re:Not a real world case study on A Strategic Comparison of Windows Vs. Unix · · Score: 1

    Here is Sun's take on SunRay scalability:

    http://www.sun.com/products/sunray/whitepapers/s un ray1.scalability.wp.pdf

    SunRays are huge network bandwidth hogs. I remember reading that you needed dedicated (no network traffic other than SunRay stuff) 100Mbit network segments, no more than 10 SunRays per segment. Seems like this would require a significant change of network architecture (unless you were designing this from scratch for a new site). For 500 SunRays you would need 50 100Mbit Network interfaces on the 4800 (MANY points of failure) or 5-10 Gbit NIC's and a bunch of switches. Forget about trying to run SunRays through a WAN.

    Also, Sun tried this before with JavaStations and dumped the product. Is the SunRay here to stay?