I do find it anoying when the linux community slates microsoft for having bugs in their code, do'es this mean that linux has no bugs what so ever. cos if you say yes then you are lying..
I get the overall impression that most of you well and truly believe that NT/2K/2003 server falls over every 10 minites or you can't install printers or any other hardware correctly. well I run a whole pile of Windows based servers and most of the time they run perfectly for months on end, when problems ocour it is often the person who configured the boxes fault for messing it up.
and just before you all flame me for being a microsoft whore I run a whole pile of unix servers as well.
I do find it anoying when the linux community slates microsoft for having bugs in their code, do'es this mean that linux has no bugs what so ever. cos if you say yes then you are lying..
I get the overall impression that most of you well and truly believe that NT/2K/2003 server falls over every 10 minites or you can't install printers or any other hardware correctly. well I run a whole pile of Windows based servers and most of the time they run perfectly for months on end, when problems ocour it is often the person who configured the boxes fault for messing it up.
and just before you all flame me for being a microsoft whore I run a whole pile of unix servers as well.