Slashdot Mirror


User: flewp

flewp's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
969
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 969

  1. But how? on Yale Students Capture Asteroid On Film · · Score: 2, Funny

    How does one capture an asteroid on film? Seems like it would break right through it. I mean, afterall, it's hurtling down from space, so it's going really fast and it's really hot.

  2. Re:Like DUH! on Napster Not To Blame · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, really. And Duh! According to the current poll it's the screaming dancing guy from MS. Sheesh.

  3. Re:"Hi, I'm Candy ;)" on Paging Eliza: Patenting IM Bots · · Score: 3, Funny

    WHAT?! She WASN'T real?!? Damnit, I thought I could have gotten some.

  4. Re:Local effect? on Energizer Mouse · · Score: 2

    I hope you don't mean what I think you mean with the right arm endurance thing.... Nah, nevermind, a geek couldn't last more than 5 minutes.

  5. Re:Isn't obvious what this is for? on Computers That Thrive in Salty, Humid Environments? · · Score: 2

    Of course. Afterall they can't download music and programs without a computer. I think I'm now 0 for 2 on jokes here today.

  6. Re:Finally! on Computers That Thrive in Salty, Humid Environments? · · Score: 2

    Doh, got caught up in making the obvious joke I didn't even read past the headline :P

  7. Finally! on Computers That Thrive in Salty, Humid Environments? · · Score: 1, Funny

    A computer that can reside in my crotch!

  8. Re:1.5Mbps for $45.95/month on AT&T Broadband Introduces Tiered Pricing · · Score: 2

    Yeah, it is. Occasionally the service goes down once in awhile, but usually not that long. Also, if it does go down, call, talk to someone at customer service and request a "refund" for the downtime. They'll most likely give you a credit, which amounts to 20 dollars. That's pretty good, considering we pay 40 dollars a month here. We got Road Runner when it first started to become available in my area (Wauwatosa) and it had some problems in the beginning. We were paying about 20 dollars a month for the first couple months just for asking for a "refund".

  9. Re:You can.. on Virtual Sword Fighting · · Score: 2

    Aside from the fact that you have to a) leave yer basement and b) take some bruises. :p
    I think bruises would be the least of one's concerns in swordfighting...

  10. Re:I watched Highlander a bit too much on Virtual Sword Fighting · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Eventually, we decided not to, because odds were that eventually, we'd want to play with them, and one of us would end up badly injured or dead. I think we made the right choice. Further evidence Darwin, and his theory of natural selection, is indeed, correct.

  11. Re:Midevil Knight? on Virtual Sword Fighting · · Score: 3, Funny

    On second thought, a vast number of /.'ers would probably use this to recreate a certain Monty Python and the Holy Grail scene... as the article says: "None shall pass".

  12. Rotating 360 Degree display on Virtual Sword Fighting · · Score: 2

    Why does the display rotate? Why couldn't it just be 30 stationary displays? It would seem stationary displays would be a lot easier to create and maybe even synchornize. Also, less moving parts would help durability. Anyone have any info on this, or has anyone seen it live at Siggraph?

  13. Midevil Knight? on Virtual Sword Fighting · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think most of the slashdot community would use this be Jedi Knights.

  14. Re:Wham! on Princeton Hacks Yale, Harvard Not Surprised · · Score: 2

    I saw this article on fark earlier today, maybe they're partly responsible. Here's a link to the msnbc article: http://www.msnbc.com/news/785677.asp?0si=-

  15. I bet on Princeton Hacks Yale, Harvard Not Surprised · · Score: 0, Troll

    John Nash had something to do with it. Or maybe we're all made up in his mind and he had to do it because that Dick Tracy looking guy told him too.

  16. Re:0.4 inches long? on New Species Found in Central Park · · Score: 2

    In reply to your sig, that's not a salami, but a 5 inch centipede in your pants. Watch out!

  17. Re:Talk about being responsible on Has TurboLinux Collapsed? · · Score: 2

    Next, people on slashdot will be saying *BSD is dying!

    err, oh wait...

  18. Re:trueSpace 6 on Software for the Realtime 3D Modeler? · · Score: 2

    Hence, the Coward in Anonymous Coward.

  19. Re:Which is why tools are so important... on Software for the Realtime 3D Modeler? · · Score: 2

    Most game companies are cheap, and full of people who are biased against anything not written in-house.

    You're obviously well more knowledgable in this area, as I have never done anything in the 3d game area, but most of the requests I see for low poly 3d modellers for games ask/demand that the user is proficient in Max.

  20. Re:Not sure what you're looking for on Software for the Realtime 3D Modeler? · · Score: 2

    I think I should also mention that if you're looking to find out how well your models perform in a game situation, the only reasonable way to tell is to actually have them in the "game" and it's engine. I don't think any 3d app can reasonably mimic the performance hit a game's render engine is going to take unless it can actually mimic or run the actual game engine.

  21. Re:trueSpace 6 on Software for the Realtime 3D Modeler? · · Score: 2

    Woohoo, a fellow tS user! And btw Lunadude/aka Moonman, thanks for the great resource site.

    Just so it isn't completely offtopic though: tS6 also will "bake" the shadows as part of the mapped UV surfaces of the meshes/polygons.

  22. Re:NURBS on Software for the Realtime 3D Modeler? · · Score: 2

    i should point out that the most of the time consuming rendering on those apps is for nurbs, not pols

    Actually, it depends on the modelling method/output of nurbs.
    From what I understand, nurbs can often be beneficial in some rendering situations, or their outputted/exported polygonal equivilants. However, from what I understand again, this is not for realtime, so my point may be moot.

  23. Not sure what you're looking for on Software for the Realtime 3D Modeler? · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are you looking for a modeller that will render as you work in realtime, or have a gamelike renderer that will render out in real time?

    It does sound like you're looking for something more in-tune with hardware realtime rendering, am I correct in thinking this?

    Most programs have an OpenGL/D3D/etc realtime modelling mode, so I guess what I'm asking is, are you looking for something that can give you an accurate representation of what it will look like when rendered in game, using a card's built-in shaders? I guess I'm just getting confused on what you mean by mapping. Are you talking vertex/polygon level procedural mapping, or texture mapping, or what?

    I'm also asking these questions so I can guage what a low-poly/gaming modeller is looking to accomplish. All my 3d renderings are done in trueSpace, using raytracing or a hybrid of radiosity/raytracing.

  24. Re:Will SFX Overtake Actors? on Talk to a Movie Digital SFX Expert · · Score: 2

    It was somewhat rhetorical, but you bring up some excellent points. One thing I started thinking about after posting was if the public would be willing to accept a new breed of CG actors/actresses. Afterall, it's often a big name actor/actress that draws people to the box office. Sure, you could use the same CG character for multiple movies, but are people going to relate to them? They won't be involved in any scandals (unless one of the artists uses them in an unauthorized porn or some such). There won't be any personal lives to follow. I personally will see a movie sometimes based on if I like the actor or not in real life. If he's known to be a total jackass, I may not be inclined to support his/her work. Usually though, it's just based on if the actor/actress is good at their job, or from people whose opinions usually reflect my own. I think people just love the juicy gossip of celebrities, and won't be that willing to give it up.

  25. Re:1984 was a work of fiction. on MIT Technology Review on Where Orwell Went Wrong · · Score: 2

    Sorry to ruin your holier than thou attitude, but despite being a work of fiction, it is very relevant.

    Lets see here, one person (or governing body) demanding more control. Cameras being installed on the streets. Stripping away our rights for our "protection". Wanting to be able to track the populace. Trying to reduce our ability to arm ourselves. Labelling those who go against the norm terrorists/a threat to the state.
    So, what's your big problem? Or do you just not care? Or are you just unwilling to heed the warnings of a fictitious book, because if it's ficticious, it couldn't possibly ever happen?

    Rocket ships sending people to the moon were written in the early 1900's. We went to the moon, didn't we? Now, realise this: I'm not saying that it is going to be true, or that because someone writes it years earlier, it will happen. What I am saying is, the warning signs are there for a society such as described in his books.