This could tatally be a "good thing" with regards to video. Just think of taking all your DVD's and merging them in to one big file that just plays... okay, thats what a playlist is for but surely an insanely high quality video format would need this sort of filesize.
Of course, we all have eyes capable of appreciating this insane quality... dont we?
Slashdot Mirror
I am just wondering here, is there some sort of performace hit in addressing normaly files while adding in support for this "petabyte" feature.
Surely the amount of bits needed to address this is going to increase and more data for addressing means less data for good ol file transfer.
Is this going to be a noticeable difference or am i just beeing a bit whore?
This could tatally be a "good thing" with regards to video. Just think of taking all your DVD's and merging them in to one big file that just plays... okay, thats what a playlist is for but surely an insanely high quality video format would need this sort of filesize.
Of course, we all have eyes capable of appreciating this insane quality... dont we?