I don't mean to be a jerk, but nothing about rc5 is learned from a brute force attack. If the first key you find is the correct key, that does not imply that rc5 is weak nor does it imply that rc5 is strong if it takes you 1000 years. We already know rc5 is strong against brute force. If someone were to set up a distributed integer factoring page that used "trial and error" that person would be called foolish. Alas d.net. The only reason people go there is cuz nugget sucks a good dick.
It juse pisses me off they use the words "cracking" and crptoanalysis. Neither is the case, they are wasting everyone's time. How about some real analysis?
Slashdot Mirror
I don't mean to be a jerk, but nothing about rc5 is learned from a brute force attack. If the first key you find is the correct key, that does not imply that rc5 is weak nor does it imply that rc5 is strong if it takes you 1000 years. We already know rc5 is strong against brute force. If someone were to set up a distributed integer factoring page that used "trial and error" that person would be called foolish. Alas d.net. The only reason people go there is cuz nugget sucks a good dick. It juse pisses me off they use the words "cracking" and crptoanalysis. Neither is the case, they are wasting everyone's time. How about some real analysis?