this is just a bunch of no-name artists bitter about how much a successful artist with a real contract makes.
hmm, britney may have a few bucks in her pocket, but a "real contract" is a far cry from a one way ticket to easy street. here is some proof.
ps - i remember reading a similar, more indepth, article of this same ilk from maximum rock and roll or some such place but this one has a picture of courtney love's boobies (albiet covered up) on the front...
Following that logic, shouldn't they be able to also sue the recording industry for releasing their songs on media that allowed, in effect, the same thing (i.e. redistribution via Napster)?
and from there it seems only natural that they should sue themselves for having made music and given the rights to a record company to give the rights to a website to give end users the opportunity to steal it!
Following that logic, shouldn't they be able to also sue the recording industry for releasing their songs on media that allowed, in effect, the same thing (i.e. redistribution via Napster)?
and from there it seems only natural that they should sue themselves for having made music and given the rights to a record company to give the rights to a website to give end users the opportunity to steal it!
You try to write a comprehensive article about AI, but yet make absolutely no mention of how future alien looking robots will be able to bring people back to life with dna but they will only live for one day "because of the space time continuum".
and surrealists have been doing them since the 20s.
Re:a.i. represents human experience (spoilers)
on
Review: A.I.
·
· Score: 1
jesus christ people. you all do realize that kubrick died quite a while ago, yes? as in, before this movie began production, right?
Re:Always with Kubrick, it hits you later...
on
Review: A.I.
·
· Score: 1
god damn it. kubrick had nothing to do with this film at all. look at the fucking credits on imdb, he is credited with only "concept". he didn't write it, direct it, or anything. he died just after finishing EWS. this is NOT a kubrick film.
dumbed down by executives? come now, this is a spielburg film, it doesn't require any outside help to dumb it down. i wish they had just taken kubrick's name off of this entirely.
Slashdot Mirror
this is just a bunch of no-name artists bitter about how much a successful artist with a real contract makes.
hmm, britney may have a few bucks in her pocket, but a "real contract" is a far cry from a one way ticket to easy street. here is some proof.
ps - i remember reading a similar, more indepth, article of this same ilk from maximum rock and roll or some such place but this one has a picture of courtney love's boobies (albiet covered up) on the front...
Following that logic, shouldn't they be able to also sue the recording industry for releasing their songs on media that allowed, in effect, the same thing (i.e. redistribution via Napster)?
and from there it seems only natural that they should sue themselves for having made music and given the rights to a record company to give the rights to a website to give end users the opportunity to steal it!
Following that logic, shouldn't they be able to also sue the recording industry for releasing their songs on media that allowed, in effect, the same thing (i.e. redistribution via Napster)?
and from there it seems only natural that they should sue themselves for having made music and given the rights to a record company to give the rights to a website to give end users the opportunity to steal it!
Sounds more like the old corporate adage of "embrace, improve, destroy" to me.
What amatuerisness.
ansel adams is a fucking tool. most of the greatest artists ever were poor as dirt. troll go home.
and surrealists have been doing them since the 20s.
jesus christ people. you all do realize that kubrick died quite a while ago, yes? as in, before this movie began production, right?
god damn it. kubrick had nothing to do with this film at all. look at the fucking credits on imdb, he is credited with only "concept". he didn't write it, direct it, or anything. he died just after finishing EWS. this is NOT a kubrick film.
dumbed down by executives? come now, this is a spielburg film, it doesn't require any outside help to dumb it down. i wish they had just taken kubrick's name off of this entirely.
is reading what you people have to say about art.
technical skill does not make an artist.
the shining is kubrick's worst film by far, and aronofsky's a fucking hack.