Self-certificates are worthless except when distributed through an existing secure channel. Without a proper certificate, all I know is I'm encrypting the session key with someone's public key, but I don't know whose it is. I might as well send the contents in the clear.
Yeah, that's what I thought. I tried sending mail to hostmaster@verisign.net because I thought the non-routability was itself a problem. It bounced - as did mail to hostmaster@verisign.com.
I think what he means is that the iPod is the only one that can remember the position you got to in an track and return to that position next time you play it - even if you listened to other tracks in the intervening time.
I'm sure the BBC has plenty of competent engineers. Unfortunately they're not the ones making the decisions. The BBC DAB stations mostly get 128 kbps or less, and this with a codec that's less advanced than MP3 (MUSICAM = MPEG audio layer 2). Meanwhile the standard audio editing software for BBC Radio works with compressed files, so every editing session involves decompress-modify-compress with the resulting build-up of artifacts.
There is also the problem that the usual vocoders for phone use are compressing the crap out of the signal - taking a 64 kb/second audio stream down to less than 4kb/sec.
I can imagine that 4 kbps would sound really bad. However, GSM uses 13 kbps normally, though there is a half-rate codec that the network can force you to use if its capacity is strained.
Microsoft pointed to this Knowledge Base article.
Choice quote:
"Not all features that are found on the Security tab are designed to help make your documents and files more secure."
Correction: One might as well call power "W-energy" because it can be measured in watts and if you know how long the power is applied for you can work out the energy involved.
It is common to describe an acceleration as a multiple of g, the acceleration due to gravity. If you know the mass involved then you can work out the force on it, but so what? One might as well call power "W-energy" because if you know how long the power is applied for you can work out an energy and measure it in watts.
The article was about suppression of statements, not suppression of names. But since you bring it up - a label such as "nigger" (or "geek") is exclusive (and so offensive) if used by someone who doesn't identify with the label but inclusive (and OK) if used by someone who does.
If you unpack an official 2.4.23 tarball and apply the official 2.4.24 patch, the result is the same as if you unpack an official 2.4.24 tarball. If you made any changes in between unpacking and patching (e.g. by configuring it or building it) then the result is not the same, but this is OK as long as you "make $CONFIG_METHOD_OF_CHOICE && make dep && make clean" in the new tree before building the new kernel.
There's plenty of damaging information about Kissinger already in the public domain. See The Trial of Henry Kissinger, a book that makes the case for his indictment.
Serial ATA isn't the only way to solve the airflow problem. You can get parallel IDE and floppy cables which have the ribbon rolled into a tube in the middle.
It seems to me to be misinformative. The need for leap seconds is due to an increase in the Earth's orbital period (year), not its rotational period. The story may be conflating the two changes.
Self-certificates are worthless except when distributed through an existing secure channel. Without a proper certificate, all I know is I'm encrypting the session key with someone's public key, but I don't know whose it is. I might as well send the contents in the clear.
Yeah, that's what I thought. I tried sending mail to hostmaster@verisign.net because I thought the non-routability was itself a problem. It bounced - as did mail to hostmaster@verisign.com.
Yes, but UnixODBC sucks ass. Look at the code and run screaming. Look for documentation and give up!
Pasting from IE to Excel works correctly.
Pasting from Mozilla Firebird to Excel doesn't.
Pasting from Mozilla to OOCalc (on Linux) does.
Looks like it's a problem with Mozilla on Windows.
Use Handle from Sysinternals. There may be something similar in the Resource Kits.
I think what he means is that the iPod is the only one that can remember the position you got to in an track and return to that position next time you play it - even if you listened to other tracks in the intervening time.
I'm sure the BBC has plenty of competent engineers. Unfortunately they're not the ones making the decisions. The BBC DAB stations mostly get 128 kbps or less, and this with a codec that's less advanced than MP3 (MUSICAM = MPEG audio layer 2). Meanwhile the standard audio editing software for BBC Radio works with compressed files, so every editing session involves decompress-modify-compress with the resulting build-up of artifacts.
I can imagine that 4 kbps would sound really bad. However, GSM uses 13 kbps normally, though there is a half-rate codec that the network can force you to use if its capacity is strained.
Possibly your cable provider is picking up an analogue signal and re-encoding it as digital. That's bound to look bad.
Furrfu! It's called a "current directory".
Microsoft pointed to this Knowledge Base article. Choice quote: "Not all features that are found on the Security tab are designed to help make your documents and files more secure."
Correction: One might as well call power "W-energy" because it can be measured in watts and if you know how long the power is applied for you can work out the energy involved.
It is common to describe an acceleration as a multiple of g, the acceleration due to gravity. If you know the mass involved then you can work out the force on it, but so what? One might as well call power "W-energy" because if you know how long the power is applied for you can work out an energy and measure it in watts.
The article was about suppression of statements, not suppression of names. But since you bring it up - a label such as "nigger" (or "geek") is exclusive (and so offensive) if used by someone who doesn't identify with the label but inclusive (and OK) if used by someone who does.
If you unpack an official 2.4.23 tarball and apply the official 2.4.24 patch, the result is the same as if you unpack an official 2.4.24 tarball. If you made any changes in between unpacking and patching (e.g. by configuring it or building it) then the result is not the same, but this is OK as long as you "make $CONFIG_METHOD_OF_CHOICE && make dep && make clean" in the new tree before building the new kernel.
Acceleration is not a force, nor does its name begin with the letter G.
The force whose name begins with the letter G is, er, gravity.
Vast tracts of low-density housing, surely?
There's plenty of damaging information about Kissinger already in the public domain. See The Trial of Henry Kissinger, a book that makes the case for his indictment.
So it's a virus, not a worm. Great piece of journalism there, guys.
Serial ATA isn't the only way to solve the airflow problem. You can get parallel IDE and floppy cables which have the ribbon rolled into a tube in the middle.
At least a few tens of thousands of those million guys are likely to be gay or bi, so there's still some opportunity for matchmaking.
Would you say that you were 90% or 95% confident that it's 95%?
What the hell was I talking about? Forget it.
It seems to me to be misinformative. The need for leap seconds is due to an increase in the Earth's orbital period (year), not its rotational period. The story may be conflating the two changes.
What's the confidence level for the 3% margin? They never state it.