Slashdot Mirror


User: jsveiga

jsveiga's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
128
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 128

  1. Re:Kind of ridiculous... on Gartner Group Suggests Dumping IIS For Now · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not quite.

    Nimda uses more ways to spread than the ones used by Code Red. Code Red used a buffer overflow, Nimda uses directory traversal to get the IIS.

    Nimda does look for possible backdoors left by Code Red or other worm.

    From CERT:

    The "Code Red" worm is malicious self-propagating code that exploits Microsoft Internet Information Server (IIS)-enabled systems susceptible to the vulnerability described in CA-2001-13 Buffer Overflow In IIS Indexing Service DLL.

    and:

    The CERT/CC has received reports of new malicious code known as the "W32/Nimda worm" or the "Concept Virus (CV) v.5." This new worm appears to spread by multiple mechanisms:
    from client to client via email
    from client to client via open network shares
    from web server to client via browsing of compromised web sites
    from client to web server via active scanning for and exploitation of various Microsoft IIS 4.0 / 5.0 directory traversal vulnerabilities (VU#111677 and CA-2001-12)
    from client to web server via scanning for the back doors left behind by the "Code Red II" (IN-2001-09), and "sadmind/IIS" (CA-2001-11) worms

  2. It seems like people are already doing it on Gartner Group Suggests Dumping IIS For Now · · Score: 4, Informative

    Take a look at the data at:
    http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/20010 8/ index.html

    Since July IIS market share has been falling.

    Check the .mil, and .br graphs!

    The share is flowing to Apache and Netscape servers.

    Joao

  3. Re:cost vs benefit on Solar Power in the Third World · · Score: 1

    >How long will all this last? My guess is that the cells may (may!) last 10 years

    Hello, the major manufacturers offer 10-year and even 25-year warranty for their panels.

    In Brazil, because of the energy crisis (hey, if it's good for California...), the government has dropped almost all taxes for alternative energy.

    Nevertheless, it still can take about 30 years for a solar system (!?) to pay for itself, because "wired" electricity costs US$ 0.075 per kW.h.

    Now, don't forget that when a country deploys "solar farms", it's actually using other country's energy (unless the panels are locally manufactured). Making a solar panel requires a lot of energy. In a way, if I buy a panel manufactured in California, I'll have clean energy here at the expense of more pollution in the US :)

    Anyone knows how long does it take for a panel to "pay" for this energy?