MS Office will always be superior. Why use a crappy clone when the best is readily available?
sincerely I prefer the traditional UI of OO rather than the obnoxious ribbon of MS, not to mention many problems I had nn the past with MS office which I could resolve only with OOo
mostrly true... and sad... a s*it is a s*it even if you call it a cake
Apart from being an utterly uninspired naff name, its already been done - OSF/1 (Alpha unix) was renamed to Tru64 by compaq which did precisely zip for its sales or penetration. Product names get changed when the people managing them can't think of anything else better to do to promote it.
Slashdot Mirror
MS Office will always be superior. Why use a crappy clone when the best is readily available?
sincerely I prefer the traditional UI of OO rather than the obnoxious ribbon of MS, not to mention many problems I had nn the past with MS office which I could resolve only with OOo
Apart from being an utterly uninspired naff name, its already been done - OSF/1 (Alpha unix) was renamed to Tru64 by compaq which did precisely zip for its sales or penetration. Product names get changed when the people managing them can't think of anything else better to do to promote it.