Now comes David Schmidt to demonstrate that both of these camps are wrong (in this he and Cecil agree). His theory instead focuses on the deceleration of the water droplets by the air producing a cyclone effect within the shower. This theory is similar to, but distinct from, the ``entrainment'' theory that Cecil put forward so many years ago. And to me, significantly more believable.
Six of one, half dozen of the other... If the air decelerates the water, the water accelerates the air. The moving water column imparts motion on the air. Whether this is "entrainment" is your call...
Slashdot Mirror
Now comes David Schmidt to demonstrate that both of these camps are wrong (in this he and Cecil agree). His theory instead focuses on the deceleration of the water droplets by the air producing a cyclone effect within the shower. This theory is similar to, but distinct from, the ``entrainment'' theory that Cecil put forward so many years ago. And to me, significantly more believable.
Six of one, half dozen of the other... If the air decelerates the water, the water accelerates the air. The moving water column imparts motion on the air. Whether this is "entrainment" is your call...