← Back to Users
biesi's activity in the archive.
That's not what I meant. I was referring to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16236 1, which is already fixed, even for Firefox 2.
FWIW, Firefox 2 will support unicode in filenames and such despite also still working on Win9x.
> Let's say you've got a binary file checked into CVS. Two people might be working on it. How will they know? If all developers are using "cvs edit" before editing a file, they will know. You might want to read http://www.loria.fr/~molli/cvs/doc/cvs_10.html#SEC 83 which explains how to avoid that problem.
Make it easy for the developers to get a pretty front end to a database
To my knowledge, this is one of the things you've got to pay for, ie. the free version misses database connections.
I just looked at the feature matrix at Borland's homepage, and indeed the "open" version is missing data access components.
Slashdot Mirror
That's not what I meant. I was referring to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16236 1, which is already fixed, even for Firefox 2.
FWIW, Firefox 2 will support unicode in filenames and such despite also still working on Win9x.
> Let's say you've got a binary file checked into CVS. Two people might be working on it. How will they know?
C 83 which explains how to avoid that problem.
If all developers are using "cvs edit" before editing a file, they will know.
You might want to read http://www.loria.fr/~molli/cvs/doc/cvs_10.html#SE
Make it easy for the developers to get a pretty front end to a database
To my knowledge, this is one of the things you've got to pay for, ie. the free version misses database connections.
I just looked at the feature matrix at Borland's homepage, and indeed the "open" version is missing data access components.