but then again, what does "natural" and "artificial" mean, apart from attesting value to only one of the statements?
"no wonder communism is bad if before everything was natural and then it was artificial."
suppose you left away those two words, that would take away much of the edge of your statement without actually changing it.
then again, if we make our statements depend on their form instead of on their content, how can we claim ethical superiority to lawyers (which i for one do)?
Slashdot Mirror
but then again, what does "natural" and "artificial" mean, apart from attesting value to only one of the statements?
"no wonder communism is bad if before everything was natural and then it was artificial."
suppose you left away those two words, that would take away much of the edge of your statement without actually changing it. then again, if we make our statements depend on their form instead of on their content, how can we claim ethical superiority to lawyers (which i for one do)?