Link: https://www.change.org/p/lg-pl...
It's asking LG to include just one 3D-enabled TV in their 2018 OLED line-up. (LG is singled out because their 2016 OLED range was easily the best implementation of home 3D there has ever been).
I'm a little depressed by the level of pleasure in others' misfortune that's being exhibited in some of these comments.
Can someone explain the logic of saying "I personally am not interested in feature X, therefore I am going to celebrate when it is taken away from people who do care about it?"
That's not only selfish, it's rather short-sighted: it sends the TV industry a clear message that it's okay for them to ignore what an appreciable subset of customers want, and there will be no negative consequences when they do.
So, what's going to happen when they decide to abolish a feature that you *do* care about?
Slashdot Mirror
Link: https://www.change.org/p/lg-pl... It's asking LG to include just one 3D-enabled TV in their 2018 OLED line-up. (LG is singled out because their 2016 OLED range was easily the best implementation of home 3D there has ever been).
I'm a little depressed by the level of pleasure in others' misfortune that's being exhibited in some of these comments. Can someone explain the logic of saying "I personally am not interested in feature X, therefore I am going to celebrate when it is taken away from people who do care about it?" That's not only selfish, it's rather short-sighted: it sends the TV industry a clear message that it's okay for them to ignore what an appreciable subset of customers want, and there will be no negative consequences when they do. So, what's going to happen when they decide to abolish a feature that you *do* care about?