Regan was never president. White House Chief of Staff and Secretary of the Treasury before that, but never president. Unless I'm in an alternate universe, Ronald REAGAN is who you were referring to. Proofread!
FWIW, my grammar sucks, I'm working on it. But I try to re-read things I type before hitting "Submit" so that one day, maybe people will go back to thinking spelling and grammar are important again. I would love to say it's all Republicans...or all Democrats...but it's both, whether in a hurry or just ignorant. I don't know. The drop in people caring, however, is unpresidented.
To probably most Trump voters, everything that you listed (Muslim ban, the wall, dismantling the EPA & Dept of Education, Jeff Sessions, silencing Elizabeth Warren) would be considered a positive thing.
You're right that Trump voters consider these things to be positive, but only because most of what you wrote is false or misleading (either intentionally or not).
It's not a Muslim ban but a temporary ban on the people from 7 countries that are predominantly Muslim (out of 40 in the world), 5 of which we've bombed in the last decade.
...Elizabeth Warren was rightfully silenced because she was slandering someone without any evidence whatsoever. When you're shut up for talking out of your ass you don't get to be a martyr. Sources:
I don't follow you, AC. So, Trump Voters think positively about false, misleading things? fake news, what? If they don't consider them positive, they are logically false?
Why include that last bit about the ban: "5 of which we've bombed in the last decade"? Did Trump announce it like, "it's not a ban against all Muslims, just 7 countries that are predominantly Muslim (out of 40 in the world), 5 of which we've bombed"? Since you don't feel "positively" about it, you didn't mention Giuliani's statement that the Donald wanted to figure out a way to legally ban Muslims?
As for Warren, I believe she was trying to present her evidence, but I could be wrong. What I do feel more strongly about, is that regardless of how much you profess to know, only Jeff Sessions knows if he is truly a racist or not. The rest of us, if we choose to try, can only determine that based upon observable behavior and action.
lol...Thank you for bringing this to attention here, some "folks" push the Bible and everything in it as infallible, but that doesn't mean they have read it or read it on a regular basis.
I agree! I can't remember exactly what Stern said, but didn't he suggest it would be terrible for Trump's mental state staying president long-term?
Trump can't make everybody happy, and I think not even able to make a simple majority happy is driving him a slight bit nuts!
Like state lottery proceeds where I am, that are supposed to go to education but instead go to ?????. Maybe they should go to fighting gambling addictions?
Slashdot Mirror
And how far away (time-wise) is this from happening? Or will the Republican Congress cave to the Emperor?
with the Russians when Regan was president.
Regan was never president. White House Chief of Staff and Secretary of the Treasury before that, but never president. Unless I'm in an alternate universe, Ronald REAGAN is who you were referring to. Proofread!
FWIW, my grammar sucks, I'm working on it. But I try to re-read things I type before hitting "Submit" so that one day, maybe people will go back to thinking spelling and grammar are important again. I would love to say it's all Republicans...or all Democrats...but it's both, whether in a hurry or just ignorant. I don't know. The drop in people caring, however, is unpresidented.
"Make America Grate Again!"
To probably most Trump voters, everything that you listed (Muslim ban, the wall, dismantling the EPA & Dept of Education, Jeff Sessions, silencing Elizabeth Warren) would be considered a positive thing.
You're right that Trump voters consider these things to be positive, but only because most of what you wrote is false or misleading (either intentionally or not).
It's not a Muslim ban but a temporary ban on the people from 7 countries that are predominantly Muslim (out of 40 in the world), 5 of which we've bombed in the last decade.
...Elizabeth Warren was rightfully silenced because she was slandering someone without any evidence whatsoever. When you're shut up for talking out of your ass you don't get to be a martyr. Sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
I don't follow you, AC. So, Trump Voters think positively about false, misleading things? fake news, what? If they don't consider them positive, they are logically false? Why include that last bit about the ban: "5 of which we've bombed in the last decade"? Did Trump announce it like, "it's not a ban against all Muslims, just 7 countries that are predominantly Muslim (out of 40 in the world), 5 of which we've bombed"? Since you don't feel "positively" about it, you didn't mention Giuliani's statement that the Donald wanted to figure out a way to legally ban Muslims? As for Warren, I believe she was trying to present her evidence, but I could be wrong. What I do feel more strongly about, is that regardless of how much you profess to know, only Jeff Sessions knows if he is truly a racist or not. The rest of us, if we choose to try, can only determine that based upon observable behavior and action.
Whew...and a good thing too...Now we all know, positively, 100%, no doubt, that everything on Wikipedia is true.
Too bad not everyone is like you.
from Nissan? ;-)
lol...Thank you for bringing this to attention here, some "folks" push the Bible and everything in it as infallible, but that doesn't mean they have read it or read it on a regular basis.
BS -
C'mon AC, quit saying BS - before every comment you make. Quit being weak and log in with a real account. You are a puppet, with a bag over it's head.
I agree! I can't remember exactly what Stern said, but didn't he suggest it would be terrible for Trump's mental state staying president long-term? Trump can't make everybody happy, and I think not even able to make a simple majority happy is driving him a slight bit nuts!
Like state lottery proceeds where I am, that are supposed to go to education but instead go to ?????. Maybe they should go to fighting gambling addictions?
It's the new "Math", get over it or get with it! It's tremendous! More Yuge-er than before!