I'm a longtime Google manager. Here's what I wrote on an internal Google mailing list:
There are no blacklists.
If you trace back where this notion came from, it was a claim that there was one manager who allegedly kept a list of people they didn't want to work with. Seems plausible. But that's it. If one wants to call that a blacklist, OK, but it shouldn't be interpreted as an institutionalized phenomenon at Google.
Actually, Taco's comment is fair. Yes, strictly speaking I did get TPJ back from EarthWeb in April. That was legal closure, but not quite relax-and-kick-back closure.
Running TPJ myself is impossible given my busy day job at O'Reilly. So relax-and-kick-back closure meant finding a good permanent home for the magazine, which I'm happy to say is now the case.
It'll stay a physically separate magazine. What "supplement" means is that it'll be bagged with Sys Admin in the stores, and internally CMP will have one infrastructure for both Sys Admin and TPJ to save on costs.
I'm a longtime Google manager. Here's what I wrote on an internal Google mailing list:
There's a time lag between when the USPTO issues a patent and when Google receives the data from the USPTO. It'll be live soon.
-Jon (Google Patents guy)
Running TPJ myself is impossible given my busy day job at O'Reilly. So relax-and-kick-back closure meant finding a good permanent home for the magazine, which I'm happy to say is now the case.
It'll stay a physically separate magazine. What "supplement" means is that it'll be bagged with Sys Admin in the stores, and internally CMP will have one infrastructure for both Sys Admin and TPJ to save on costs.
That's not accurate, Bruce. I have never owned any stock in EarthWeb.
Jon Orwant
We (O'Reilly) already pay Larry to work on Perl full time.
-Jon