The problem is, other nations are starting to realize that our court system has turned into some sort of Kafkaesque parody of justice. We have a Stalin-sized Gulag, famed for its state-sponsored regime of anal rape. Almost everyone in the Gulag was coerced into a false confession in a process euphemistically called "plea bargaining". No self-respecting nation would surrender their citizen to be ground up by that sort of infernal meat grinder.
Shame on our judicial oligarchy. They are making us look like some sort of North Korean dystopia.
The man being persecuted did no wrong. Perhaps we should call him a dissident.
Someone with some cash to throw around ought to commission a heroic bronze statue of this dissident, and with great fanfare deliver it to the town where he is imprisoned.
The people you disparage as "nutters" keep getting proven right time and time again.
My general impression is this: if you can think of some data-related practice that's creepy, villainous, censorious, and/or collaborationist - then Google, FB, and the rest of Surveillance Valley are almost certainly doing it.
What I want to know is: why the fuck is Slashdot posting Google-shill articles submitted by the well known fascist Lauren "Down With Freedom" Weinstein?
1. Fedgov prints a bunch of free money out of thin air, calling it "Quantitative Easing"
2. Fedgov gives that free money to their friends / "campaign contributors" in the big banks
2. The big banks bid up every asset they can find, but still have piles and piles of free money sitting around.
3. Big banks can't figure or anything else to do with all that free public money - so they start giving a bunch of it to the bankers' inbred, half-wit cousins who run VC firms in Palo Alto
4. The VCs discover they've been given more money than they can possibly waste on hookers & blow. So they hire a few of their butt-buddies from the Stanford dorms to found some "startups".
5. The butt-buddies look at what other loss-making companies are doing, then do the same thing only with an even stupider company name.
6. No business acumen, nor any actual talent, are required to get a leadership role at a startup. You just have to be from the "right schools". Consequently the startups have no business model and not much ability to execute. But hey - at least this time they didn't pay "outrageous" salaries to a bunch of filthy working class nerds!
6. The startups make a handsome loss, undercut and bankrupt a few legitimate businesses, and keep on getting bigger and bigger valuations each time they return to the VC teat to suck more free public money.
7. Somewhere way up the food chain, someone in DC or New Jack City gets a little nervous about propping up so many worthless loss-making "startup" companies.
8. The steady stream of free public money starts to dry up
9. The Crash!
10. Somewhere in Palo Alto, a Stanford boy can no longer afford his Personal Ass Sanitation Assistant, and is forced to resume wiping his own butt.
It's been said a million times, but it's still true: the users *are* cattle. They're the product. Advertisers, PR firms, and the regime are the customers.
Slashdot Mirror
The problem is, other nations are starting to realize that our court system has turned into some sort of Kafkaesque parody of justice. We have a Stalin-sized Gulag, famed for its state-sponsored regime of anal rape. Almost everyone in the Gulag was coerced into a false confession in a process euphemistically called "plea bargaining". No self-respecting nation would surrender their citizen to be ground up by that sort of infernal meat grinder.
Shame on our judicial oligarchy. They are making us look like some sort of North Korean dystopia.
In Soviet America, corruption is compliance with the law.
The man being persecuted did no wrong. Perhaps we should call him a dissident.
Someone with some cash to throw around ought to commission a heroic bronze statue of this dissident, and with great fanfare deliver it to the town where he is imprisoned.
The people you disparage as "nutters" keep getting proven right time and time again.
My general impression is this: if you can think of some data-related practice that's creepy, villainous, censorious, and/or collaborationist - then Google, FB, and the rest of Surveillance Valley are almost certainly doing it.
What I want to know is: why the fuck is Slashdot posting Google-shill articles submitted by the well known fascist Lauren "Down With Freedom" Weinstein?
The law in a whore. The side with the most money always wins.
Another scurrilous kangaroo kourt, drunk on power, afflicting our communities and terrorizing decent people. It's DUH LAW!
Your recommended punctuation is clumsy and unstylish.
1. Fedgov prints a bunch of free money out of thin air, calling it "Quantitative Easing"
2. Fedgov gives that free money to their friends / "campaign contributors" in the big banks
2. The big banks bid up every asset they can find, but still have piles and piles of free money sitting around.
3. Big banks can't figure or anything else to do with all that free public money - so they start giving a bunch of it to the bankers' inbred, half-wit cousins who run VC firms in Palo Alto
4. The VCs discover they've been given more money than they can possibly waste on hookers & blow. So they hire a few of their butt-buddies from the Stanford dorms to found some "startups".
5. The butt-buddies look at what other loss-making companies are doing, then do the same thing only with an even stupider company name.
6. No business acumen, nor any actual talent, are required to get a leadership role at a startup. You just have to be from the "right schools". Consequently the startups have no business model and not much ability to execute. But hey - at least this time they didn't pay "outrageous" salaries to a bunch of filthy working class nerds!
6. The startups make a handsome loss, undercut and bankrupt a few legitimate businesses, and keep on getting bigger and bigger valuations each time they return to the VC teat to suck more free public money.
7. Somewhere way up the food chain, someone in DC or New Jack City gets a little nervous about propping up so many worthless loss-making "startup" companies.
8. The steady stream of free public money starts to dry up
9. The Crash!
10. Somewhere in Palo Alto, a Stanford boy can no longer afford his Personal Ass Sanitation Assistant, and is forced to resume wiping his own butt.
Hahahahahaha
I wouldn't exactly describe a gaggle of attorneys who feel themselves professionally inadequate to represent the President as a "top" law firm.
The fifty cent armies are out in force for this article.
Hired shills for the Democrat party sure do love calling people "faggot".
What's shocking is that is the app's *intended* behavior. I always figured it was just an annoying bug in their shitty Agile(tm) software.
Fuck you, Instagram. What scumbags.
It's been said a million times, but it's still true: the users *are* cattle. They're the product. Advertisers, PR firms, and the regime are the customers.
Reddit - come for the bigoted elitists lecturing everyone about their moral superiority - stay for the censorship!
Fake-progressive running dogs sure do love authoritarian capitalism.
Disarm the common people! Down with freedom and democracy! The Social Justice reich shall last a thousand years!
The banking system is an important tool for the regime to oppress the people.
Censorship is rape. Anyone endorsing censorship is endorsing rape, and is probably a rapist themselves. Toss 'em in the Gulag!
Hurrah for the Stasi!
Hurrah for the Stasi!
Hurrah for the Stasi!
Touche!
Gulag FTW!!!1!!1!!?!?!!
Vote Kamala Harris for bigoted puritanical neo-fascism!
Stupid disarmed Euro serfs who deludedly imagine themselves freemen.
Tyranny starts in the mind. Europe is already half way there.