Re:thats what the fish is for
on
Author Unknown
·
· Score: 1
I wonder if Mr Foster did use the word fingerprint
in his original manuscript and then the
editor changed it to DNA, surely text analysis
is as good as fingerprints, very high probability
but possibility for dup's. Is it really as
good as DNA?
The "why don't we address" quote means they probably couldn't get hold of "engineering" to work out the answer.
MS have plenty of experience trying to compare NT vs high end Unix (eg Solaris). You can bet this is just a sanitized version of what they tell their customers
Slashdot Mirror
I wonder if Mr Foster did use the word fingerprint
in his original manuscript and then the
editor changed it to DNA, surely text analysis
is as good as fingerprints, very high probability
but possibility for dup's. Is it really as
good as DNA?
I saw those too, such an *amateur* production
The "why don't we address" quote means they
probably couldn't get hold of "engineering"
to work out the answer.
MS have plenty of experience trying to
compare NT vs high end Unix (eg Solaris).
You can bet this is just a sanitized version of what they tell their customers