There needs to be permission to collect the data to be able to operate a social media service, and creating an account would seem to fulfil your criterion in relation to information volunteered. This is a pretty standard term in existing laws relating to data processing.
I know some climate scientists, and it would be reasonable to say they would much rather human activity was not driving climate change as those that have children would like them to inherit a reasonable world.
So if the preponderance of scientific evidence supports something, a scientist saying so can only be politically motivated? That's an odd assertion, and an odd view of scientists. I am not a climate scientist, but I know some.
I looked at the link. It achieves its result by using a cherry-picked non-standard baseline using figures uncorrected for the instrument response.
Your tag line says that the 1930s was the hottest decade. It wasn't.
You are discussing a US housing construction method not typically used in France, and not likely to be adopted in volume, unless it meets the 100 year lifetime requirement and uses good insulation, e,g, SIPPs.
There are some outliers, often people with significant mental health issues, or other issues which may mean independent living won't work for them, unfortunately.
Another example might be Japan, which even up to 1970 was seen to have a poor reputation for quality, but was transformed by the mid 1980s, with Korea roughly a decade behind. I'd expect China is going through the same process. It suggests that a nation can turn itself around in terms of manufacturing and engineering, which means the USA could be more of a manufacturing and engineering powerhouse, but it might take a generation to achieve it.
The USA used to value manufacturing and quality very highly. Around 1900 the UK and Germany held the reputation for excellence, but by 1930, the USA was also seen in this light. By 1970 the reputation of the UK seemed to have been tarnished in the mass automotive industry, although it seems to have recovered.
If there was indeed a smaller CO2 output then, one of the possibilities is that climate sensitivity is on the upper end of the range, and the flattening of temperature rise from 1940-70 was due to sulphur compound emissions associated with a move to lower quality coal. It's not exactly good news.
You seem to be confusing science (demonstrating the causes of climate change) with politics. Should scientists not study climate change, leaving the world unprepared to adapt, for political convenience? As is alarmism about draconian politics doesn't seem to be matched by things such as £60 annual fuel cost levies or charging £0.05 for plastic bags. If there is something likely to result in a draconian outcome it's doing nothing now.
No, there are many variables. The composition of the atmosphere is one, and life has radically altered it in the past. Volcanism is another, such as the Deccan Traps. Ocean and air current changes affect it, and these are affected by changes to the continents. Albedo affects it, and long term continental drift affects it, as does vegetation. The carbon cycle is a factor, part of which is the deposition of calcium carbonate by shellfish. And those are just some of the other mechanisms.
There are use cases for lower overheads but for, say, processing your bank account, you might accept lower performance for accuracy or security. Even where performance is critical, accuracy might be too, although it the program embedded in my washing machine got the length of the spin cycle wrong by 10% I might not care, but if it got stuck in an infinite loop I might. To be fair, with something like that, produced in the millions, a higher degree of testing is cents per unit. Control of inputs before, say, an array access, gives more confidence in that testing.
There are areas where a subtle array bug might be hard to detect. Having worked with neural networks, I can attest that classification behaviour can be good, even with bugs in a library.
I like C, although I used BASIC, Fortran, Pascal Modula-2 before it, but a good range checking mechanism with the option to turn it off if you need it is handy. It's not as neat syntactically as some other languages, but the overloading operators in C++ brings its own dangers
This isn't the point in the Milankovitch cycle we should be expecting an increase, though. It had been on an overall cooking trend in the 8000 years up to 1850. The article is also referring to 1C average world temperature increase, but it is greater in the Arctic.
Just because it changes does not mean that the current changes aren't caused by humans. As an analogy, humans dying of cholera is not mutually exclusive with murder, or indeed the murder of someone with cholera.
In the first decade of computers we went from nothing to COBOL and LEO. In the last decade c!oud has increased penetration, and there are new web frameworks, but I don't see the same revolutionary level of change.
Slashdot Mirror
Linux is the kernel. Android is not Linux, but used it, but is not GNU/Linux.
That's recombination of subatomic particles, releasing energy, not creation of matter.
There needs to be permission to collect the data to be able to operate a social media service, and creating an account would seem to fulfil your criterion in relation to information volunteered. This is a pretty standard term in existing laws relating to data processing.
I know some climate scientists, and it would be reasonable to say they would much rather human activity was not driving climate change as those that have children would like them to inherit a reasonable world.
So if the preponderance of scientific evidence supports something, a scientist saying so can only be politically motivated? That's an odd assertion, and an odd view of scientists. I am not a climate scientist, but I know some.
I looked at the link. It achieves its result by using a cherry-picked non-standard baseline using figures uncorrected for the instrument response. Your tag line says that the 1930s was the hottest decade. It wasn't.
You are discussing a US housing construction method not typically used in France, and not likely to be adopted in volume, unless it meets the 100 year lifetime requirement and uses good insulation, e,g, SIPPs.
What level of insulation is in each of the two types of house, and how long is each expected to last?
There are some outliers, often people with significant mental health issues, or other issues which may mean independent living won't work for them, unfortunately.
Another example might be Japan, which even up to 1970 was seen to have a poor reputation for quality, but was transformed by the mid 1980s, with Korea roughly a decade behind. I'd expect China is going through the same process. It suggests that a nation can turn itself around in terms of manufacturing and engineering, which means the USA could be more of a manufacturing and engineering powerhouse, but it might take a generation to achieve it.
The USA used to value manufacturing and quality very highly. Around 1900 the UK and Germany held the reputation for excellence, but by 1930, the USA was also seen in this light. By 1970 the reputation of the UK seemed to have been tarnished in the mass automotive industry, although it seems to have recovered.
If there was indeed a smaller CO2 output then, one of the possibilities is that climate sensitivity is on the upper end of the range, and the flattening of temperature rise from 1940-70 was due to sulphur compound emissions associated with a move to lower quality coal. It's not exactly good news.
Pre CO2? Do you understand how much coal was being mined and burned back then? I'll answer that for you: apparently you don't.
You seem to be confusing science (demonstrating the causes of climate change) with politics. Should scientists not study climate change, leaving the world unprepared to adapt, for political convenience? As is alarmism about draconian politics doesn't seem to be matched by things such as £60 annual fuel cost levies or charging £0.05 for plastic bags. If there is something likely to result in a draconian outcome it's doing nothing now.
The GP said nothing that suggested creation of matter by the sun.
No, the solar flux is orders of magnitude greater than human use of energy. You seriously need to revisit your math.
Using your PPM logic I can show that cyanide is perfectly safe.
Cooling
No, there are many variables. The composition of the atmosphere is one, and life has radically altered it in the past. Volcanism is another, such as the Deccan Traps. Ocean and air current changes affect it, and these are affected by changes to the continents. Albedo affects it, and long term continental drift affects it, as does vegetation. The carbon cycle is a factor, part of which is the deposition of calcium carbonate by shellfish. And those are just some of the other mechanisms.
Where's the new physics for assertion #1?
There are areas where a subtle array bug might be hard to detect. Having worked with neural networks, I can attest that classification behaviour can be good, even with bugs in a library.
I like C, although I used BASIC, Fortran, Pascal Modula-2 before it, but a good range checking mechanism with the option to turn it off if you need it is handy. It's not as neat syntactically as some other languages, but the overloading operators in C++ brings its own dangers
Indeed it isn't, nor is axial tilt, but the latter should be creating a cooling trend.
This isn't the point in the Milankovitch cycle we should be expecting an increase, though. It had been on an overall cooking trend in the 8000 years up to 1850. The article is also referring to 1C average world temperature increase, but it is greater in the Arctic.
Just because it changes does not mean that the current changes aren't caused by humans. As an analogy, humans dying of cholera is not mutually exclusive with murder, or indeed the murder of someone with cholera.
In the first decade of computers we went from nothing to COBOL and LEO. In the last decade c!oud has increased penetration, and there are new web frameworks, but I don't see the same revolutionary level of change.