What criticism? "It hurts my feelings and implies my view on things is wrong and I don't like it"? "Cherrypicking confirmationbias notanexpert blah blah blah"?
You 'liberals' just say things like "cherry picking" without evaluating the reasoning at all. The act of expression is inherently "cherry picking". You start with a passion, you proceed with a coherent argument, and you end with supporting evidence. This is the utmost any human being can do with an honest mind and a will to work hard. It's the other party that must do likewise and come up with counter evidence backed with rationale if they wish to object....unless they have tons of money and a horde of brainless idiots that will do whatever they're programmed to do on command.
What your side is lacking is any rationale refutation. I've looked, I've listened, and it has not come. Rebuttal always devolves into subjectivity and 'virtue-signalling'. Surely you have an authoritative rebuttal that you could reference for me? Surely you would be the first one I've asked that could provide such a thing?
People hate paying taxes. They hate income tax. They hate the banks and the arm of their operations known as 'the government'. They hate being bled dry like cattle. This will not change. So the demand for an alternative financial system will not go away easily.
The potential economy living under a cryptocurrency is limited only by its ability import enough dollars to pay off the tax man. And guess what will happen when that economy can't import enough dollars? Revolution. People will feel absolutely forced to do something to protect their livelihoods.
The volatility in the market is due to speculation, yes, but what is the nature of the speculation, what is the ultimate point? The market is deciding which model of cryptocurrency will serve for the new economy. There will be only one. Yes you might dump $10k into a single Bitcoin and then the market might decide the next day that Bitcoin Cash will be the best and you lose everything. Yes that is going to happen to a lot of people. But ONE of these cryptocurrencies is going to win. The crypto market is not a bubble that is going to pop. The motivation, the necessity, is absolutely there, and there's not a god damn thing the banks can do to stop it short of declaring war (literally) on everyone who uses crypto. This won't be so easy to do as the wars and coups they've stirred up since the industrial revolution. There is no Bitcoinland to destabilize and invade. It's everywhere in the world at once. Undermining people's choice to participate in a crypto-economy undermines the bank's own economy. So it will be very, very difficult for them to do anything about it.
You always say a bunch of crazy shit with no references or evidence. You always get modded up. You are a fucking paid shill and this moderation system is completely corrupt and broken.
This is the work of the BANKS. Both parties work for the banks. The bank issues the command to the party with the best-matching image. Then the brainwashed masses (no one is worse than the Canadians) take a side and divide themselves further from each other.
If it's a problem, just don't pay the fucking tax and keep doing what you're doing. Don't commit suicide or shoot yourself in the foot because the media tells you there's no hope.
In REALITY, the world these psychotic media-cycle-consuming drones are divorced from, the SCHOOLS will have to pay....obviously it's in their interest to have graduate students....obviously they aren't going to let the entirety of their research operations be scuttled....
This seems to be a move to attack the endowments of these educational institutions, if indeed it has an intent. Backlash against the neocon think tanks? I'm for it.
These people such as you are responding to are not not people, they are drones, machines. They take cues from the media because it's big and "impressive" and they model their thought after this impression. Their human spirit is crushed. The only thing human about them is that they can make human children, but those children only have hope for humanity when some one intervenes and protects them from their parents.
The "sexual harassment" phenomenon is simply a ploy to destroy men's freedom and make sure there is a way to take down any man that displeases the plutocracy. Men are dangerous. It's men who make Civil War. Civil war as a huge danger to this system. It's crumbling but the mortar to restore it is en route. We need to rebel very soon or we are all going to become drones, and then destroyed utterly after human labor becomes obsolete to the plutocracy.
Mature behavior from a woman is not "screwing". It's making meaningful lifelong relationships and starting a family.
RRRRRRRAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH GET IN THE KITCHEN?????????? RRKEJRLSEKRJSEL WTFFFFFFFFFFFFF MYSOGYNIST!!!!!!!!!
Cool off, psychotic liberal drones.
The same standard applies to men for the same exact reasons.
Which is more like an infant: Playing with a thing and then throwing it away after it bores you or Developing skills around a thing so it becomes a tool that serves you in your livelihood
We aren't talking about just any 'thing' here, we are talking about the object of a great deal of our instinctual behavior. Something that factors into our nature on every level. Something that used to factor into our societies, something that was of critical importance to the development of science and everything else. The objects of a stable family.
And then come the war-torn, impoverished, desperate people from which 'liberals' and 'leftists' were crafted. They actually have no idea of freedom like classical liberal philosophers. They just want more stuff and easier living. Because they're animals. So they sacrifice the family so they can slave away to get a bunch of baubles. They're less intelligent than a magpie with a nut-sized brain. Calling them 'animals' is an insult to animals. They're mind-controlled drones that the plutocracy uses as proxies for real human beings to forge an illusion of social consensus. When we stop falling for it and take action ourselves immediately, ignoring these brainless unreasoning "people", and destroy their masters directly, then the world can begin to be free.
Namecalling. Constantly halting speech broken with much punctuation. "You clearly do not understand...." (yet no reasoning whatsoever) More namecalling Profanity Complains about strawmen - then proceeds to make strawmen
You don't analyze how you know anything. You are not a rational-minded person. You are a born and bred witch-hunter 'on steroids'. You become emotional in the face of calm argument. You don't seek solutions, you seek revenge. You are a brainless animal. This is a very partisan issue. Real, free, sane human beings vs. subhuman brainwashed consumerist tools.
We need to exterminate you all. Kill you dead. You're nothing but remote controlled beasts. Your fate is sudden death and extirpation. Either your masters will grind you to dust and spread your remains over their fields after they have gotten their way with their inquisition (you will be utterly useless after the automation revolution), or we will stop you before it's too late.
Literally EVERYONE understands your opinion, your motivated guess at reality, that you parade as an "argument". What do you propose? Endless witch hunts, or that all males finally be banned from any position of authority over anyone?
And often the person "asking" uses their position
often
How do you know? Because this is the narrative that is repeated again and again? Or do you have some kind of running account from surveillance videos that you keep? Because otherwise you're basing your view of reality on hearsay.
Here is something a lot of left-leaning people do not want to understand, something they "still don't get":
weak people lose in this world and there is nothing you can do to change it.
Even if you are a victim, you can not place all the blame on the perpetrator of the crime.
You have to look in yourself and find a fault and bolster it against future attacks. Externalizing everything to make it solely a matter of (mob) "justice" is not how you get stronger. So it may be prudent to punish perpetrators, but the victim mindset is NEVER commendable no matter how badly a person suffers. You still have your life to live, get over your troubles and become stronger, or stop living. You aren't special for being a victim, the rules still apply to you, natural law is not suspended. When you have all these supports for the victim mindset the victim becomes further victimized because they are validated for whining and don't seek to strengthen themselves, instead they become paranoid and cry for more authority intervention.
How convenient for the establishment that validates these people!
Literally EVERYONE understands your opinion, your motivated guess at reality, that you parade as an "argument".
What do you propose? Endless witch hunts, or that all males finally be banned from any position of authority over anyone?
And often the person "asking" uses their position
often/quote
How do you know? Because this is the narrative that is repeated again and again? Or do you have some kind of running account from surveillance videos that you keep? Because otherwise you're basing your view of reality on hearsay.
Here is something a lot of left-leaning people do not want to understand, something they "still don't get": weak people lose in this world and there is nothing you can do to change it.
Even if you are a victim, you can not place all the blame on the perpetrator of the crime.
You have to look in yourself and find a fault and bolster it against future attacks. Externalizing everything to make it solely a matter of (mob) "justice" is not how you get stronger. So it may be prudent to punish perpetrators, but the victim mindset is NEVER commendable no matter how badly a person suffers. You still have your life to live, get over your troubles and become stronger, or stop living. You aren't special for being a victim, the rules still apply to you, natural law is not suspended.
When you have all these supports for the victim mindset the victim becomes further victimized because they are validated for whining and don't seek to strengthen themselves, instead they become paranoid and cry for more authority intervention.
How convenient for the establishment that validates these people!
You mean a media-architected witch hunt?
This is what happens when you don't speak up. This is what happens when you become so complacent you lose the will to question.
A certain (majority) section of the liberal-identifying people fueled by the media rumors they blindly and stupidly believe are being used to destroy anyone in reach who does or says anything against the establishment.
Since they're all charged up from "RUSSIAN HACKING, TRUMP'S COUP" they're doing overtime in this way. They're getting revenge for the "injustices" they are told are real!
"POL POT....processing....equates to BAD BOY"
what a coincidence that he was a political enemy of your nanny.
No room for unthinking animals in the new world. Either your masters will kill you or we will. You're toast, lemming.
Desperation and grief are not mental illnesses. They are sound and logical reactions to a hostile environment.
We have to stop pretending that everything in our westernized societies is okay and that the people who can't adapt are insane somehow. It's not these people that need treatment by and large, it's this society that needs treatment.
The few cases of people born with clear physical defects that lead to depression are not a significant fraction of people who commit suicide or want to.
It worked for the allies in WW2. But the revolution I'm talking about is different.
It's not a matter of who disagrees, it's a matter of who follows a coherent and sound train of thought to reach their conclusions. After that it's a judgement of how well a person upholds a way of life that is in accordance with the natural order - which is rather more complicated to explain. If they have an unsound mind, they have to be destroyed in case their insanity spreads to the innocent. If they have a sound mind and are purposed to evil, they must be destroyed in case they gain power over the innocent. These conclusions follow directly from natural law - 'survival of the fittest' on its face, but actually there are limits of "fitness" - a trait that appears to contribute to fitness, when enhanced too greatly, becomes unfit due to the fact that it destroys all of what it consumes. Unsoundness of thought and mind is unfit in any case, evil is 'too fit' and causes collapse of everything it touches.
The allies fought for monolithic plutocracy and the enslavement of the entire world under the banking system. They are the reason the global ecosystem is failing. They are the reason for terrorism. They are the reason for "civil rights" that only extend to affirm the manufactured consensus. They are the reason for the soulless consumerism and the destruction of culture. It is their greed and blind self interest and the willingness of their subhuman drones to brainlessly advocate for them by the motivations of bribery and psychological manipulation that we must end....or else we all die....it seems rather likely that most life on Earth will die also. Even if the plutocracy re-engineers the ecosystem and saves the world, YOU are a replaceable component of this antisocial economy. To these people, these plutocrats, who you serve, you might as well be a machine
Here is something you parroting idiots should try to realize: When the constitution was drafted, people actually did a lot of talking in public places. People weren't the drones you see today scurrying through parking lots among hundreds of people they don't know and will never talk to to get their business done and to return to their comfy echo chambers as soon as possible. Public space was a well-used forum. People used to stop and talk to each other, even if they didn't know each other.
The founders made this law so that the most well-used forum was a platform for anyone to say whatever they felt was necessary. That is the spirit of the First Amendment.
It perhaps took for granted the sense of community that has been totally uprooted in our society today by economics (read: the engineering by the banks).
Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
Tiptoeing around using the word "hater" doesn't mean that's not exactly what you're saying against "white supremacists" who all have the same argument as the strawman version of them you have in your head. You are seriously carrying on a conversation with an imaginary ideal of your opponent. Who and what are you even responding to? The comic? Which is now suddenly a "white supremacist" manifestation of some kind?
Slashdot Mirror
What criticism?
"It hurts my feelings and implies my view on things is wrong and I don't like it"?
"Cherrypicking confirmationbias notanexpert blah blah blah"?
You 'liberals' just say things like "cherry picking" without evaluating the reasoning at all. The act of expression is inherently "cherry picking". You start with a passion, you proceed with a coherent argument, and you end with supporting evidence. This is the utmost any human being can do with an honest mind and a will to work hard.
It's the other party that must do likewise and come up with counter evidence backed with rationale if they wish to object....unless they have tons of money and a horde of brainless idiots that will do whatever they're programmed to do on command.
What your side is lacking is any rationale refutation. I've looked, I've listened, and it has not come. Rebuttal always devolves into subjectivity and 'virtue-signalling'.
Surely you have an authoritative rebuttal that you could reference for me? Surely you would be the first one I've asked that could provide such a thing?
Anyone who subscribes to the idea of "hate speech" or "hate crimes" is a brainless animal.
Free speech is free speech.
Crime is crime.
Tacking on "hate" to either is just political manipulation of our sense of justice and our rationality in general.
People hate paying taxes. They hate income tax. They hate the banks and the arm of their operations known as 'the government'. They hate being bled dry like cattle. This will not change. So the demand for an alternative financial system will not go away easily.
The potential economy living under a cryptocurrency is limited only by its ability import enough dollars to pay off the tax man.
And guess what will happen when that economy can't import enough dollars?
Revolution. People will feel absolutely forced to do something to protect their livelihoods.
The volatility in the market is due to speculation, yes, but what is the nature of the speculation, what is the ultimate point?
The market is deciding which model of cryptocurrency will serve for the new economy. There will be only one. Yes you might dump $10k into a single Bitcoin and then the market might decide the next day that Bitcoin Cash will be the best and you lose everything. Yes that is going to happen to a lot of people. But ONE of these cryptocurrencies is going to win. The crypto market is not a bubble that is going to pop. The motivation, the necessity, is absolutely there, and there's not a god damn thing the banks can do to stop it short of declaring war (literally) on everyone who uses crypto. This won't be so easy to do as the wars and coups they've stirred up since the industrial revolution. There is no Bitcoinland to destabilize and invade. It's everywhere in the world at once. Undermining people's choice to participate in a crypto-economy undermines the bank's own economy. So it will be very, very difficult for them to do anything about it.
You always say a bunch of crazy shit with no references or evidence.
You always get modded up.
You are a fucking paid shill and this moderation system is completely corrupt and broken.
What the fuck are you trying to say? Talk like a human being you retard.
In truth it is merely a huge tax break for the wealthy.
Which is good for this economy. That's what this economy is.
This economy is not 'your' economy and it never really was.
Wrong, retard.
This is the work of the BANKS.
Both parties work for the banks. The bank issues the command to the party with the best-matching image.
Then the brainwashed masses (no one is worse than the Canadians) take a side and divide themselves further from each other.
You brainless partisan animal.
Both parties are working for the same overall goal.
Normally I'd ignore it, but somebody modded it up.
Normally I'd ignore it, but SHINY BAIT YUMMY YUMMY SHINY YUMYUMS
Anyway, dumbass, the schools will just have to pay their grad students more if they want to keep them. Not so complicated.
If it's a problem, just don't pay the fucking tax and keep doing what you're doing. Don't commit suicide or shoot yourself in the foot because the media tells you there's no hope.
In REALITY, the world these psychotic media-cycle-consuming drones are divorced from, the SCHOOLS will have to pay....obviously it's in their interest to have graduate students....obviously they aren't going to let the entirety of their research operations be scuttled....
This seems to be a move to attack the endowments of these educational institutions, if indeed it has an intent.
Backlash against the neocon think tanks? I'm for it.
You don't get it.
These people such as you are responding to are not not people, they are drones, machines. They take cues from the media because it's big and "impressive" and they model their thought after this impression. Their human spirit is crushed. The only thing human about them is that they can make human children, but those children only have hope for humanity when some one intervenes and protects them from their parents.
The "sexual harassment" phenomenon is simply a ploy to destroy men's freedom and make sure there is a way to take down any man that displeases the plutocracy.
Men are dangerous. It's men who make Civil War.
Civil war as a huge danger to this system. It's crumbling but the mortar to restore it is en route. We need to rebel very soon or we are all going to become drones, and then destroyed utterly after human labor becomes obsolete to the plutocracy.
Mature behavior from a woman is not "screwing".
It's making meaningful lifelong relationships and starting a family.
RRRRRRRAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH GET IN THE KITCHEN?????????? RRKEJRLSEKRJSEL WTFFFFFFFFFFFFF MYSOGYNIST!!!!!!!!!
Cool off, psychotic liberal drones.
The same standard applies to men for the same exact reasons.
Which is more like an infant:
Playing with a thing and then throwing it away after it bores you
or
Developing skills around a thing so it becomes a tool that serves you in your livelihood
We aren't talking about just any 'thing' here, we are talking about the object of a great deal of our instinctual behavior. Something that factors into our nature on every level. Something that used to factor into our societies, something that was of critical importance to the development of science and everything else. The objects of a stable family.
And then come the war-torn, impoverished, desperate people from which 'liberals' and 'leftists' were crafted. They actually have no idea of freedom like classical liberal philosophers. They just want more stuff and easier living. Because they're animals. So they sacrifice the family so they can slave away to get a bunch of baubles. They're less intelligent than a magpie with a nut-sized brain. Calling them 'animals' is an insult to animals. They're mind-controlled drones that the plutocracy uses as proxies for real human beings to forge an illusion of social consensus. When we stop falling for it and take action ourselves immediately, ignoring these brainless unreasoning "people", and destroy their masters directly, then the world can begin to be free.
Namecalling.
Constantly halting speech broken with much punctuation.
"You clearly do not understand...." (yet no reasoning whatsoever)
More namecalling
Profanity
Complains about strawmen - then proceeds to make strawmen
You don't analyze how you know anything.
You are not a rational-minded person. You are a born and bred witch-hunter 'on steroids'. You become emotional in the face of calm argument. You don't seek solutions, you seek revenge. You are a brainless animal.
This is a very partisan issue.
Real, free, sane human beings vs. subhuman brainwashed consumerist tools.
We need to exterminate you all. Kill you dead. You're nothing but remote controlled beasts. Your fate is sudden death and extirpation. Either your masters will grind you to dust and spread your remains over their fields after they have gotten their way with their inquisition (you will be utterly useless after the automation revolution), or we will stop you before it's too late.
You're an ape
My "philosophy" is natural law. So yeah, anyone who questions it does die, as a matter of physics. It's just a question of when.
Some people still don't get it...
Literally EVERYONE understands your opinion, your motivated guess at reality, that you parade as an "argument". What do you propose? Endless witch hunts, or that all males finally be banned from any position of authority over anyone?
And often the person "asking" uses their position
often
How do you know? Because this is the narrative that is repeated again and again? Or do you have some kind of running account from surveillance videos that you keep? Because otherwise you're basing your view of reality on hearsay. Here is something a lot of left-leaning people do not want to understand, something they "still don't get": weak people lose in this world and there is nothing you can do to change it. Even if you are a victim, you can not place all the blame on the perpetrator of the crime. You have to look in yourself and find a fault and bolster it against future attacks. Externalizing everything to make it solely a matter of (mob) "justice" is not how you get stronger. So it may be prudent to punish perpetrators, but the victim mindset is NEVER commendable no matter how badly a person suffers. You still have your life to live, get over your troubles and become stronger, or stop living. You aren't special for being a victim, the rules still apply to you, natural law is not suspended. When you have all these supports for the victim mindset the victim becomes further victimized because they are validated for whining and don't seek to strengthen themselves, instead they become paranoid and cry for more authority intervention. How convenient for the establishment that validates these people!
Some people still don't get it...
Literally EVERYONE understands your opinion, your motivated guess at reality, that you parade as an "argument". What do you propose? Endless witch hunts, or that all males finally be banned from any position of authority over anyone?
And often the person "asking" uses their position
often/quote How do you know? Because this is the narrative that is repeated again and again? Or do you have some kind of running account from surveillance videos that you keep? Because otherwise you're basing your view of reality on hearsay. Here is something a lot of left-leaning people do not want to understand, something they "still don't get": weak people lose in this world and there is nothing you can do to change it. Even if you are a victim, you can not place all the blame on the perpetrator of the crime. You have to look in yourself and find a fault and bolster it against future attacks. Externalizing everything to make it solely a matter of (mob) "justice" is not how you get stronger. So it may be prudent to punish perpetrators, but the victim mindset is NEVER commendable no matter how badly a person suffers. You still have your life to live, get over your troubles and become stronger, or stop living. You aren't special for being a victim, the rules still apply to you, natural law is not suspended. When you have all these supports for the victim mindset the victim becomes further victimized because they are validated for whining and don't seek to strengthen themselves, instead they become paranoid and cry for more authority intervention. How convenient for the establishment that validates these people!
You mean a media-architected witch hunt? This is what happens when you don't speak up. This is what happens when you become so complacent you lose the will to question. A certain (majority) section of the liberal-identifying people fueled by the media rumors they blindly and stupidly believe are being used to destroy anyone in reach who does or says anything against the establishment. Since they're all charged up from "RUSSIAN HACKING, TRUMP'S COUP" they're doing overtime in this way. They're getting revenge for the "injustices" they are told are real!
"POL POT....processing....equates to BAD BOY" what a coincidence that he was a political enemy of your nanny. No room for unthinking animals in the new world. Either your masters will kill you or we will. You're toast, lemming.
Slowly merging the language of the insane hyperbole of "election hacking" narrative with the language of traditional political campaigning.
Desperation and grief are not mental illnesses. They are sound and logical reactions to a hostile environment.
We have to stop pretending that everything in our westernized societies is okay and that the people who can't adapt are insane somehow. It's not these people that need treatment by and large, it's this society that needs treatment.
The few cases of people born with clear physical defects that lead to depression are not a significant fraction of people who commit suicide or want to.
It worked for the allies in WW2.
But the revolution I'm talking about is different.
It's not a matter of who disagrees, it's a matter of who follows a coherent and sound train of thought to reach their conclusions. After that it's a judgement of how well a person upholds a way of life that is in accordance with the natural order - which is rather more complicated to explain.
If they have an unsound mind, they have to be destroyed in case their insanity spreads to the innocent. If they have a sound mind and are purposed to evil, they must be destroyed in case they gain power over the innocent.
These conclusions follow directly from natural law - 'survival of the fittest' on its face, but actually there are limits of "fitness" - a trait that appears to contribute to fitness, when enhanced too greatly, becomes unfit due to the fact that it destroys all of what it consumes. Unsoundness of thought and mind is unfit in any case, evil is 'too fit' and causes collapse of everything it touches.
The allies fought for monolithic plutocracy and the enslavement of the entire world under the banking system. They are the reason the global ecosystem is failing. They are the reason for terrorism. They are the reason for "civil rights" that only extend to affirm the manufactured consensus. They are the reason for the soulless consumerism and the destruction of culture.
It is their greed and blind self interest and the willingness of their subhuman drones to brainlessly advocate for them by the motivations of bribery and psychological manipulation that we must end....or else we all die....it seems rather likely that most life on Earth will die also.
Even if the plutocracy re-engineers the ecosystem and saves the world, YOU are a replaceable component of this antisocial economy. To these people, these plutocrats, who you serve, you might as well be a machine
It's them or us.
We're not looking to make them change. We're looking to put them down once and for all.
Here is something you parroting idiots should try to realize:
When the constitution was drafted, people actually did a lot of talking in public places. People weren't the drones you see today scurrying through parking lots among hundreds of people they don't know and will never talk to to get their business done and to return to their comfy echo chambers as soon as possible.
Public space was a well-used forum. People used to stop and talk to each other, even if they didn't know each other.
The founders made this law so that the most well-used forum was a platform for anyone to say whatever they felt was necessary. That is the spirit of the First Amendment.
It perhaps took for granted the sense of community that has been totally uprooted in our society today by economics (read: the engineering by the banks).
Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
Tiptoeing around using the word "hater" doesn't mean that's not exactly what you're saying against "white supremacists" who all have the same argument as the strawman version of them you have in your head. You are seriously carrying on a conversation with an imaginary ideal of your opponent. Who and what are you even responding to? The comic? Which is now suddenly a "white supremacist" manifestation of some kind?
You're a brainless kneejerking animal.
You haven't asked any critical questions about this case at all.