Unless they pay for it. Thats the logic behind this. It's not like everyone who burns a CD is trying to make a profit, the majority of people are in fact just burning CD's for pleasure.
I was simply stating that with windows XP, it can only recognize 32 CPU's. I have never heard of HPC cluster of XP boxes, and because of this all the other CPU's (1368) would be wasted. If you can tell me where a XP cluster is set up that uses multiple machines for parallel processing, let us know.
Slashdot Mirror
Unless they pay for it. Thats the logic behind this. It's not like everyone who burns a CD is trying to make a profit, the majority of people are in fact just burning CD's for pleasure.
I was simply stating that with windows XP, it can only recognize 32 CPU's. I have never heard of HPC cluster of XP boxes, and because of this all the other CPU's (1368) would be wasted. If you can tell me where a XP cluster is set up that uses multiple machines for parallel processing, let us know.
Not to mention, they would have 1368 wasted CPU's......