Slashdot Mirror


User: tinomeinen

tinomeinen's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7

  1. Re: They should name it ForX. It's a fork right? on XFree86 Fork Gets a Name, Website · · Score: 1

    BTW I didn't see keith listed as a contact person on the website. Didn't look hard enough?

  2. Larry Nivens Ringworld on Clarke's Rendezvous with Rama going Hollywood? · · Score: 1

    and Asimovs Foundation

  3. Re:Whoops! (And a scripting question) on Evolution Reaches A New Milestone · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, happened to me too: calender crashed, and contact list completely whiped away.
    Do the following:

    exit evolution
    killev
    restart evolution

    Now everything works and you have your contacts back end the calender works.
    Tino Meinen

  4. april wil be the best month of the year on Apache 2.0 Goes Gold! · · Score: 2, Informative

    KDE 3.0, Apache 2.0, Mozilla 1.0, myownsillyproject 0.0

  5. Re:Well go ahead, got any better ideas? on Mozilla 0.9.7 Released! · · Score: 1

    Open unwanted windows by themselves

  6. Re:Don't forget that Ulrich attacks Linus as well on RMS Accused Of Attempting Glibc Hostile Takeover · · Score: 1
    I agree, it would be terribly rude to say that. But I think Stallman would say, please produce free software or else I won't use it, or write my own software that will do the same.

    Your last point about your freedom to produce closed software is not the issue here. It's another discussion. But of course, you can produce closed software. You're a free man. But I will not use your software then, I'm free too you know.

  7. Don't forget that Ulrich attacks Linus as well on RMS Accused Of Attempting Glibc Hostile Takeover · · Score: 1
    "...The compatibility code is needed because of poor design decisions of the kernel developers who constantly have to adjust the interface to new requirements..."

    Though not in words like "raging maniac" and such, Ulrich apparently does not like wat Linus is doing with the Linux kernel as well.

    Although I admire all the time and devotion Ulrich spends in developing glibc, and it is obviously clear that he cares very much for his project, it seems to me Ulrich sounds like a paranoid, obsessed with a man who he thinks is threatening him and trying to take over his project.
    However, glibc is GPL'd. That means RMS, or I, or anybody else can take over, fork, do whatever we please with glibc. The only thing we cannot do ist take away this freedom from other users or developers.

    I'm happy to believe that Stallman can be difficult to work with or to converse with. But over the course of twenty years or more, the only thing he has done is produce free software, persuade others to produce free software, and strive to create a world where everybody can use free software. I see no harm in that.