Adam J. Richter wrote:
> What the announcement did not mention is that if
> you try to configure glibc-2.2.4, you discover
> that it does not want to build under gcc-3.
Actually, there is a sentence that says that:
"And while we are talking about compilers; gcc 3
can NOT be used." (from glibc-2.2.4 release notes)
Adam J. Richter wrote:
> What the announcement did not mention is that if
> you try to configure glibc-2.2.4, you discover
> that it does not want to build under gcc-3.
Actually, there is a sentence that says that:
"And while we are talking about compilers; gcc 3
can NOT be used." (from glibc-2.2.4 release notes)