Reminds me of this homebuilt remote mower:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~tnpshow/RCLM/intro.htm
The best ever would be if you mounted a wireless videocamera on top so you could get a first-person view from the mower.
The chart seems to indicate these are percentages of those that reported engaging in questionable practices; i.e. 15% of *those* changed a study under pressure from funding sources. That wouldn't imply that 15% of the total scientific population has done so, just those that admit unethical behavior. That could represent 15% of 1% of all scientists.
Slashdot Mirror
Reminds me of this homebuilt remote mower: http://members.iinet.net.au/~tnpshow/RCLM/intro.htm The best ever would be if you mounted a wireless videocamera on top so you could get a first-person view from the mower.
We have 16,000 employees and Nick Burns, our company's Computer Guy.
If you include it in the body of an HTML mail message.
NTLMv2 is based on MD4 and MD5... which would also (hypothetically) be deprecated.
Probably a good choice; embedded Linux can keep eggs twice as warm as WinCE, from what I hear.
The article in the Register notes that they were the only Linux shop though; all the others were already MS.
The chart seems to indicate these are percentages of those that reported engaging in questionable practices; i.e. 15% of *those* changed a study under pressure from funding sources. That wouldn't imply that 15% of the total scientific population has done so, just those that admit unethical behavior. That could represent 15% of 1% of all scientists.