In a quantum universe with many possible worlds for each Observer to experience one of per one time quantum... there must be a first Observer it is convenient to call God who exist the entire lifespan of the universe and who sees the entire universe, all the space of all time. By so collapsing all possible super positions of mutually exclusive physical possibilities down to a single fully known complete physical universe for each time quantum our so-called God Observer allows for the physical reality of the birth of all Observers born in his future Within his single life line or list of consecutive possible worlds. Then every Observer who is born guaranteed has one life line, minimum, which is descended from gods lifeline and inherits physical universe known to God at Observers birth Planck time but which is further characterized buy The Limited, local observation that Observer will Go On to do in life. Then the start of every lifeline is possibly at a definite and specific time and place known only to God in which case the experiences of these lucky sort of comparably primary lives start out in a clone of appropriate fully known physical universe wherein all ambiguity, superposition of possibilities or unknowns are resolved one permanent, hard, known way Sly God's comprehensive observation. But only, for all future Observers that is, on the first instant of time before they make any observations on their own: the very start of the life of there's which does descend from God's lifeline. For all lives of theirs which descend from other life lines than gods, in other words for most lives of most Observers, the universe inherited the parents life line will characteristically have Masters on collapse superposition of possibilities due to the extremely limited capacity of the other-than-God-type Observer of the parent universe to do observation there. Presumably God comprehensively observes entire universe so all observers in God's future have at least one life that makes intellectual sense to me, where a totally forms, fully qualified slash Quantified slash determined known fast class collapsed, and thus, to us, intuitively physically real universe serves as the seed starting out. But most people's lives will not be of this rare sort of singular type with a collapsed real single physical seed world made by gods knowledge of all space-time, since most people's lives, statistically, started at some superposition of the places and times where and / or when they might have been born Hubbard point of view of a predecessor Observer
If Observer number 1000 has a 3 in 30 trillion chance of seeing number 2000 being born at some Place slash time out of three possible locations and dates and times, then I think it's reasonable for us to assume that this distribution of possible outcomes for 1000 creates four distinct, mutually exclusive progenitor universes which some 4 lives 2000 could have as a first frame of time: 3 of them differ from one another on at least the details of where and when 2000 came into existence, and if 1,000 always observes the birth of 2K no matter which of the times and places in all possible worlds open to 1000 she manages to be born at would create another 2.999 Plus Trillian start conditions for lives of 2000. But now I think instead that even if there are 2.999 + trillion different lives for 1000 where the birth of 2k.never affects him, or is discovered by him at all, all those lives may share a common uniform identical superposition of unfollowed possibilities for the actual details of 2k's birth, then it seems reasonable to me given the limited local observation both 1k and 2k will only ever do that 2k could experience just one more life descended from the coherent total superposition of all the possible prior states as cloud, in spite of the trillions of lifelines where the identical airtight superposition occurs. I don't know how the details known to 1000 that the parts of 1000's universes that are observed by him in each of the different 2.999 + trillion lifelines of his where in there is no indicati
Slashdot Mirror
:{ is
In a quantum universe with many possible worlds for each Observer to experience one of per one time quantum... there must be a first Observer it is convenient to call God who exist the entire lifespan of the universe and who sees the entire universe, all the space of all time. By so collapsing all possible super positions of mutually exclusive physical possibilities down to a single fully known complete physical universe for each time quantum our so-called God Observer allows for the physical reality of the birth of all Observers born in his future Within his single life line or list of consecutive possible worlds. Then every Observer who is born guaranteed has one life line, minimum, which is descended from gods lifeline and inherits physical universe known to God at Observers birth Planck time but which is further characterized buy The Limited, local observation that Observer will Go On to do in life. Then the start of every lifeline is possibly at a definite and specific time and place known only to God in which case the experiences of these lucky sort of comparably primary lives start out in a clone of appropriate fully known physical universe wherein all ambiguity, superposition of possibilities or unknowns are resolved one permanent, hard, known way Sly God's comprehensive observation. But only, for all future Observers that is, on the first instant of time before they make any observations on their own: the very start of the life of there's which does descend from God's lifeline. For all lives of theirs which descend from other life lines than gods, in other words for most lives of most Observers, the universe inherited the parents life line will characteristically have Masters on collapse superposition of possibilities due to the extremely limited capacity of the other-than-God-type Observer of the parent universe to do observation there. Presumably God comprehensively observes entire universe so all observers in God's future have at least one life that makes intellectual sense to me, where a totally forms, fully qualified slash Quantified slash determined known fast class collapsed, and thus, to us, intuitively physically real universe serves as the seed starting out. But most people's lives will not be of this rare sort of singular type with a collapsed real single physical seed world made by gods knowledge of all space-time, since most people's lives, statistically, started at some superposition of the places and times where and / or when they might have been born Hubbard point of view of a predecessor Observer If Observer number 1000 has a 3 in 30 trillion chance of seeing number 2000 being born at some Place slash time out of three possible locations and dates and times, then I think it's reasonable for us to assume that this distribution of possible outcomes for 1000 creates four distinct, mutually exclusive progenitor universes which some 4 lives 2000 could have as a first frame of time: 3 of them differ from one another on at least the details of where and when 2000 came into existence, and if 1,000 always observes the birth of 2K no matter which of the times and places in all possible worlds open to 1000 she manages to be born at would create another 2.999 Plus Trillian start conditions for lives of 2000. But now I think instead that even if there are 2.999 + trillion different lives for 1000 where the birth of 2k.never affects him, or is discovered by him at all, all those lives may share a common uniform identical superposition of unfollowed possibilities for the actual details of 2k's birth, then it seems reasonable to me given the limited local observation both 1k and 2k will only ever do that 2k could experience just one more life descended from the coherent total superposition of all the possible prior states as cloud, in spite of the trillions of lifelines where the identical airtight superposition occurs. I don't know how the details known to 1000 that the parts of 1000's universes that are observed by him in each of the different 2.999 + trillion lifelines of his where in there is no indicati