>> Only hackers will attempt to circumvent the technology in order to prove that it can be done. We're not designing the technology for them.
Ever heard of 'script kiddies'?
After all, airports already arbitrarily subject people to random inspection of their luggage.
Exactly! Do a 'random inspection' on anyone that matches. If they're not a terrorist, don't tell them they were detected.
Slashdot Mirror
Nothing is 100% reliable.
3 days from release. No, on second thought, 3 seconds.
>> Only hackers will attempt to circumvent the technology in order to prove that it can be done. We're not designing the technology for them. Ever heard of 'script kiddies'?
Who says that's the best the government has?
Whoops, only the first sentence should've been italicized.
>>you KNOW someone who's bags are searched because they look like a terrorist is going to go running straight to their lawyer.
Not if you just say it's a 'random baggage check'.
After all, airports already arbitrarily subject people to random inspection of their luggage. Exactly! Do a 'random inspection' on anyone that matches. If they're not a terrorist, don't tell them they were detected.
No, i meant 1000s, or 'thousands'
No-one's stopping them from using another LCD.
It seems like it would be, until someone brings in a team of 1000s of expert linguists.