My company was using Mercury Interactive's WinRunner for a while, but has since switched to Seapine's QA Wizard.
We found that with WinRunner, it took a long time to create the scripts - which sometimes took longer because it semi-frequently crashes. We ended up purchasing the advanced training class that WinRunner offers, but the training received only seemed rudimentary. It also requires that your QA people have the ability to program - which I am not sure is a fair requirement. After about 12-14 months of WinRunner, we gave up on it.
At the moment, we are using QA Wizard. We haven't been using it for very long, but it does seem to be much easier for the QA people to create their test scripts and test the web pages.
Slashdot Mirror
My company was using Mercury Interactive's WinRunner for a while, but has since switched to Seapine's QA Wizard. We found that with WinRunner, it took a long time to create the scripts - which sometimes took longer because it semi-frequently crashes. We ended up purchasing the advanced training class that WinRunner offers, but the training received only seemed rudimentary. It also requires that your QA people have the ability to program - which I am not sure is a fair requirement. After about 12-14 months of WinRunner, we gave up on it. At the moment, we are using QA Wizard. We haven't been using it for very long, but it does seem to be much easier for the QA people to create their test scripts and test the web pages.