Hmmmm . . . your solution seems not to involve my own death . . . not bad, not bad.
I, personally, think it's interesting how clear a choice America was given in 2000--Mr. Environment, Mr. Clinton-Style Peace Lover, Al Gore, vs. Mr. America First, Bushie. Of course, the sad thing is, most people didn't care until the big Chad Crisis.
Gore may have been too namby-pamby, too soft, too wimpish, to have effective dealt with this, but I don't think Bush's hard line will be effective in the long run either.
I guess systematically wiping out mankind might be
a bit of a sticky wicket; it'd be hard to do right, and of course, there's all those bleeding hearts who wouldn't want to die. Still . . don't let the terrorists destroy civilization! Let's destroy it ourselves, first! Then what do they do? Crash an airplane into *our* caves? Bwa ha ha ha!
And either way, whether we're killing everyone or merely rubblizing ourselves, think of the economic benefits! Either project would require so much effort that unemployment would vanish! Come to think of it, what if we just kill the unemployed?
If Al Qaida thinks they can solve problems by killing people, boy howdy, they ain't seen nothing yet.
It's rather simple: systematic extermination of the entire human race.
We're all badly behaved little monkeys, really, and we're not going to stop biting each other any time soon. So, before we kill ourselves AND the only known chunk of rock that can successfully sustain diverse and plentiful life, let's just stop all the fightin' and the fussin' and start the exterminatin'.
Or at least get a bunch of those Euphio machines. We'll torture Vonnegut until he tells us how.
Slashdot Mirror
Hmmmm . . . your solution seems not to involve my own death . . . not bad, not bad.
I, personally, think it's interesting how clear a choice America was given in 2000--Mr. Environment, Mr. Clinton-Style Peace Lover, Al Gore, vs. Mr. America First, Bushie. Of course, the sad thing is, most people didn't care until the big Chad Crisis.
Gore may have been too namby-pamby, too soft, too wimpish, to have effective dealt with this, but I don't think Bush's hard line will be effective in the long run either.
I guess systematically wiping out mankind might be
a bit of a sticky wicket; it'd be hard to do right, and of course, there's all those bleeding hearts who wouldn't want to die. Still . . don't let the terrorists destroy civilization! Let's destroy it ourselves, first! Then what do they do? Crash an airplane into *our* caves? Bwa ha ha ha!
And either way, whether we're killing everyone or merely rubblizing ourselves, think of the economic benefits! Either project would require so much effort that unemployment would vanish! Come to think of it, what if we just kill the unemployed?
If Al Qaida thinks they can solve problems by killing people, boy howdy, they ain't seen nothing yet.
Sweet Hallie Selassie, where was my brain? I meant my hard drive has 1 gig.
No, if you're talking memory, not mass storage, I've got a whopping 16 MB. Whoo!
It's rather simple: systematic extermination of the entire human race.
We're all badly behaved little monkeys, really, and we're not going to stop biting each other any time soon. So, before we kill ourselves AND the only known chunk of rock that can successfully sustain diverse and plentiful life, let's just stop all the fightin' and the fussin' and start the exterminatin'.
Or at least get a bunch of those Euphio machines. We'll torture Vonnegut until he tells us how.
Somewhat off-topic, but . . .
They're making an MP3 player that has 80 times more memory than my computer.
Hmmm . . . I really feel like setting Ol' Stupid on fire now.
Who else read this with a wistful sigh? Who else suffers the shame of a crappy home PC?