Quote "(for the LAST TIME idiots, we don't want to take away your guns, we just want to keep them out of the hands of kids!)"
I suggest before you make statements like this you read the actual bills that they are trying to pass. Do not read the popular press as al,ost all of them are anti-gun. Also do not listen to the pro-gun crowds because if it restricts guns at all the fanatics will go nuts.
I actually agree with some of the bills (like the one to close the gun show loophole), but if you read them for yourself the majority of the bills will take the guns away. So it is a little counter to your statement. Of course you are probably one of those screaming liberal democrats who will just dismiss this out of hand and then you think you are better than pro-gun people who do the same to your arguments.
You gotta be kidding me, people modded this steaming pile to a 4.
One, it is not like they are saying kids can no longer play this type of game. They are just saying that they think parents should be more involved in what the kids are watching, playing, etc.
Unfortunately with the sad state of most parents, laws have to be put into place to help try and force this to happen.
I bet anything you are a Democrat. The real source of violence is guns. That is why the majority of the cities in the US with high murder rates ban guns (Wahington D.C.) so not having guns is really helping out there huh? Or how about this, I own a variety of different firearms, but have never comitted any crime, never mind one of a violent nature. Come to think of it all of my friends and coworkers that own weapons also have never comitted a crime.
So maybe it has a little more to do with the people in possession of the gun, than the gun itself.
I think there should be a law that keeps morons like you from having opinions and the ability to post that opinion about issues that are obviously too complex for their deficient brain to process.
When people use incorrect technical terms throughout an article. A hub that can do NAT, well then it is not a hub anymore is it. And "over-the-counter routing" that is an interesting term, did not know there was such a thing maybe, I should go pick up the over counter BGP solution for my redundant network. I also did not realize that NAT was a routing solution. I think I should go back and read my cisco books again.
Quote "(for the LAST TIME idiots, we don't want to take away your guns, we just want to keep them out of the hands of kids!)" I suggest before you make statements like this you read the actual bills that they are trying to pass. Do not read the popular press as al,ost all of them are anti-gun. Also do not listen to the pro-gun crowds because if it restricts guns at all the fanatics will go nuts. I actually agree with some of the bills (like the one to close the gun show loophole), but if you read them for yourself the majority of the bills will take the guns away. So it is a little counter to your statement. Of course you are probably one of those screaming liberal democrats who will just dismiss this out of hand and then you think you are better than pro-gun people who do the same to your arguments.
You gotta be kidding me, people modded this steaming pile to a 4. One, it is not like they are saying kids can no longer play this type of game. They are just saying that they think parents should be more involved in what the kids are watching, playing, etc. Unfortunately with the sad state of most parents, laws have to be put into place to help try and force this to happen. I bet anything you are a Democrat. The real source of violence is guns. That is why the majority of the cities in the US with high murder rates ban guns (Wahington D.C.) so not having guns is really helping out there huh? Or how about this, I own a variety of different firearms, but have never comitted any crime, never mind one of a violent nature. Come to think of it all of my friends and coworkers that own weapons also have never comitted a crime. So maybe it has a little more to do with the people in possession of the gun, than the gun itself. I think there should be a law that keeps morons like you from having opinions and the ability to post that opinion about issues that are obviously too complex for their deficient brain to process.
When people use incorrect technical terms throughout an article. A hub that can do NAT, well then it is not a hub anymore is it. And "over-the-counter routing" that is an interesting term, did not know there was such a thing maybe, I should go pick up the over counter BGP solution for my redundant network. I also did not realize that NAT was a routing solution. I think I should go back and read my cisco books again.