If you set a transparent proxy on the dial-in lines, you can redirect any tcp port (read 53) to 127.0.0.1:53 or evil-dns.local.net:53 et voila.
You have to use a DNS server listening on a different port. But how do you make you OS use it then (O.K. by proxying yourself). But that is not a Joe User solution.
And they can still block everyting except port 53,21,80,443 propably IMAP/POP.
Can you spell Reichstagsbrand?
Shout it, if shouting doesn't work, make one
(cyber version) of your own, by accusing Buessow
of i-dont-know-what, saying he is intentionally
attracting the public to these blocked sites.
Should be legally possible....
Slashdot Mirror
> I forgot to add, which do you think a judge is more likely to believe:
[...]
3) You saw the uptime was >200 days, I dont remembert the password.
If You guys find it, lemme know!
rupperhose the new r-tool unlike rwho, rsh etc it doesnt work remotely, it just forges uptime to "more upper"
> The word of course is Bundesverfassungsamt,
No, I wrote Reichstagsbrand and I meant it for sure. With all implications by history and literature which you might associate.
If you set a transparent proxy on the dial-in lines, you can redirect any tcp port (read 53) to 127.0.0.1:53 or evil-dns.local.net:53 et voila.
You have to use a DNS server listening on a different port. But how do you make you OS use it then (O.K. by proxying yourself). But that is not a Joe User solution.
And they can still block everyting except port 53,21,80,443 propably IMAP/POP.
> So, which country do you think knows more about
> its own Nazi movement ? The U.S. or Germany ?
I meant I wanted to know about the state of the art in Nazi-threat.
What the one or the other Gov. does know I can only guess at. I guess by recognizing that they did indeed block at least one non nazi site.
And now, what?
No reasoning no nothin. Just blocked. No control.
And in case you forgot that guy (Buessow) is not elected (not as in Beer but as in W.Bush)
> A German AC who fears U.S.-style freedoms more
> than anything else.
I fear two things:
1) not knowing the state of the Nazi movement
2) blocking of non-Nazi sites without public discussion.
The latter is dangerous and might nurture stereotypes on lots of groups.
Apparently 2) just happened.
Can you spell Reichstagsbrand? Shout it, if shouting doesn't work, make one (cyber version) of your own, by accusing Buessow of i-dont-know-what, saying he is intentionally attracting the public to these blocked sites. Should be legally possible....