I'd second that. It is absolutely rediculous to compare image quality that subtle with a JPG. The JPG artifacts washed out any differences, at least that I could see.
They should have selected a few small comparison areas and encoded them in 24bit png.
Slashdot Mirror
I'd second that. It is absolutely rediculous to compare image quality that subtle with a JPG. The JPG artifacts washed out any differences, at least that I could see. They should have selected a few small comparison areas and encoded them in 24bit png.