This is the worst logic the music business has come up with since the price of CDs. The price of CDs, more than anything, IMHO, is the reason that P2P sharing is so overwhelmingly successful. If they's make CDs available for $3-$6 (and there's plenty of fat in that price), who'd spend $2M on equipment and $20 a month connection to download commercial tracks?
I love it. This is the first time the fans have run the music business since the sixties. This round, they're going to lose.
Slashdot Mirror
This is the worst logic the music business has come up with since the price of CDs. The price of CDs, more than anything, IMHO, is the reason that P2P sharing is so overwhelmingly successful. If they's make CDs available for $3-$6 (and there's plenty of fat in that price), who'd spend $2M on equipment and $20 a month connection to download commercial tracks?
I love it. This is the first time the fans have run the music business since the sixties. This round, they're going to lose.