Look at the number of junk reply for this article. Doesn't it kind of prove his point that it's very difficult for an individual to make his opinion known to mass media? For every interesting comment made in this thread, there's 10 replies: "His gay..", "Let's ban him...", and the kind.
It proves that for a discussion to be interesting, it needs to be moderated and moderation can mean censorship. If you don't agree with the guy, at least articulate your opinions in a constructive way, don't just attack him personally because it doesn't get us anywhere.
Slashdot Mirror
It proves that for a discussion to be interesting, it needs to be moderated and moderation can mean censorship. If you don't agree with the guy, at least articulate your opinions in a constructive way, don't just attack him personally because it doesn't get us anywhere.