User: suhawk

Re:Innocent Activites?!

On: Oregon Supreme Court Declines To Hear Schwartz Case

>>Get real, theft is theft He has not been charged with theft, so this statement is completely irrelevant. Why dont you present a coherent argument instead of random abuse?

Re:Corruption?

On: Talk to the Man Who Wants to Oversee Microsoft

There will BE NO INTERVIEWS and the candidates have ALREADY BEEN CHOSE. Yes, of course these 'candidates' that were chose were already in favor of Microsoft.

Do you not think thats a bit of an unsubstantiated comment. How do you know this? And why cant you use 'chosen' instead of 'chose'?