If you were appointed to this MS oversight committee of three, what would trigger you to propose that the committee be disbanded?
In other words, what would cause you to feel you no longer need access to MS corporate books, source, or staff?
Possible examples: [A] another product gains market penetration equal to the MS Windows variants, [B] no complaints from industry competitors for 6 months, [C] MS "gives away" IExplorer and/or MS Office source via a GNU copyleft (makes it publicly-owned code).
Slashdot Mirror
If you were appointed to this MS oversight committee of three, what would trigger you to propose that the committee be disbanded?
In other words, what would cause you to feel you no longer need access to MS corporate books, source, or staff?
Possible examples: [A] another product gains market penetration equal to the MS Windows variants, [B] no complaints from industry competitors for 6 months, [C] MS "gives away" IExplorer and/or MS Office source via a GNU copyleft (makes it publicly-owned code).
Thank you.
--Adam
Thursday 13 December 2001
# # #