...has lambdas and highly late-bound, which is much nicer.
If you want your program to fail spectacularly and in non-crashing ways during runtime instead of during compile time yes.
Some of us consider incorrect output to be way worse than a segfault. Also, typing errors (As in pressing the wrong key on the keyboard.) should lead to compile time errors rather than performing something incorrect. Verbosity isn't necessarily a bad thing in languages.
Hell yes! Somebody please mod parent up. I'm tired of having errors pop up at runtime that would simply be *impossible* in any decent language.
Remind me, what federal law is NY violating? They are simply laying out the conditions of contracting with the state. How does that violate federal law?
"Among the several states": this is inside Montana. Montana is not saying who Idaho can use for an ISP. I know the ICC has been stretched a lot, but I'm not seeing it used here.
Not sure that would be a smart move for Comcast. That would essentially REQUIRE the state to provide broadband to its citizens. Comcast does NOT want to get states into that business.
It's hard to see how states could lose such a case. They aren't forbidding companies from operating in their state, they are stating conditions for companies to have state contracts.
I'm curious to know how people who assemble the high-tech sensors that are the product my company sells are going to "work remotely". "Ship parts to their homes" is NOT an answer for lots of obvious and non-obvious reasons.
You said you weren't using two factor auth because you were paying ten cents per text. Which implied that no extra cost for text would be worth it to you.
Well yeah, once you factor in the huge debt increase, the damage to the environment, the investment in 18th century tech instead of 21st century tech, yeah of course trump is an expensive disaster. But even if you leave that out, the middle class loses.
What part of "the REPUBLICANS have passed law that will remove middle class tax cuts" are you not understanding. Has NOTHING to do with the Democrats. Zero.
Of course it could be changed. Heck, the Constitution can be amended. But as it stands today, the Republicans have passed a gift for the ultra-rich, with some hand waving to fool the peasants. Wouldn't think that would work, but apparently it is.
Some middle class are seeing a cut, some seeing an increase. I'm pretty sure my best case is I'll break even, I wouldn't be surprised if I saw a tax hike. But for sure you will see a tax increase when the middle class breaks run out in 8 years. Just enough time that the Republicans who rammed this welfare for the rich thru will be able to blame someone else.
No. The tax cuts are going away. It's a REPUBLICAN tax plan. They are the ones who drafted it in secret and rammed it thru. YOUR tax cuts are going away. TRUMP's tax cuts are in place forever. Anything else you are thinking is "alternate facts".
You may or may not see more back... for the middle class, for a couple of years, some people will see decreased taxes. Some will see increased taxes. However, for sure you will see a tax hike when the cuts disappear (I believe in 8 years). Whereas the tax cuts that benefit the ultra-rich go on forever. Basically it's a cynical way for the politicians to be able to vote for the billiionare benefit w/o taking as much flak.
So this is timely because I inherited a web project that uses a JS framework about a year ago. I'm realizing that the author of the framework (I won't mention which one to avoid extraneous discussion) has moved on a couple of years ago and created a new framework. Now I'm wondering... given that the old framework is working and I've come to grips with it and have a pretty good feel for it, is there really any risk in keeping on with it? I mean, presumably Javascript is going to keep working. It may become archaic or not follow what the cool kids are doing in UI, but I'm not really worried about that. Just how likely is it that it's just going to stop working?
Slashdot Mirror
...has lambdas and highly late-bound, which is much nicer.
If you want your program to fail spectacularly and in non-crashing ways during runtime instead of during compile time yes.
Some of us consider incorrect output to be way worse than a segfault.
Also, typing errors (As in pressing the wrong key on the keyboard.) should lead to compile time errors rather than performing something incorrect.
Verbosity isn't necessarily a bad thing in languages.
Hell yes! Somebody please mod parent up. I'm tired of having errors pop up at runtime that would simply be *impossible* in any decent language.
VB was actually a decent language. Javascript, OTOH...
Remind me, what federal law is NY violating? They are simply laying out the conditions of contracting with the state. How does that violate federal law?
What part of federal law is NY violating by laying out the rules under which that will sign contracts?
It's not a "technicality". States clearly have a right, and probably an obligation, to lay out the terms under which they will contract for services.
Rogue One was a reasonable sci-fi movie. Last Jedi was a good Star Wars movie.
The Last Jedi was the first decent S.W. movie since the original trilogy.
"Among the several states": this is inside Montana. Montana is not saying who Idaho can use for an ISP. I know the ICC has been stretched a lot, but I'm not seeing it used here.
Not sure that would be a smart move for Comcast. That would essentially REQUIRE the state to provide broadband to its citizens. Comcast does NOT want to get states into that business.
It's hard to see how states could lose such a case. They aren't forbidding companies from operating in their state, they are stating conditions for companies to have state contracts.
I'm curious to know how people who assemble the high-tech sensors that are the product my company sells are going to "work remotely". "Ship parts to their homes" is NOT an answer for lots of obvious and non-obvious reasons.
You said you weren't using two factor auth because you were paying ten cents per text. Which implied that no extra cost for text would be worth it to you.
I pay $35/month and that includes unlimited USA talk and text with my limited data. Maybe you need to get another carrier. Or at least another plan.
One is part of a financial standard that has evolved over millennia. The other looks a lot like a ponzi scheme.
Or perhaps it's more like wondering why anyone would pay $10 for a pet rock.
Is that you, Vladimir?
Excuse me. If we are running 3% growth right now, why do we need the tax cut?
Well yeah, once you factor in the huge debt increase, the damage to the environment, the investment in 18th century tech instead of 21st century tech, yeah of course trump is an expensive disaster. But even if you leave that out, the middle class loses.
What part of "the REPUBLICANS have passed law that will remove middle class tax cuts" are you not understanding. Has NOTHING to do with the Democrats. Zero.
At this point, I don't care if trumpsky goes to jail, I just want him and his fellow travelers out of power.
Of course it could be changed. Heck, the Constitution can be amended. But as it stands today, the Republicans have passed a gift for the ultra-rich, with some hand waving to fool the peasants. Wouldn't think that would work, but apparently it is.
Some middle class are seeing a cut, some seeing an increase. I'm pretty sure my best case is I'll break even, I wouldn't be surprised if I saw a tax hike. But for sure you will see a tax increase when the middle class breaks run out in 8 years. Just enough time that the Republicans who rammed this welfare for the rich thru will be able to blame someone else.
No. The tax cuts are going away. It's a REPUBLICAN tax plan. They are the ones who drafted it in secret and rammed it thru. YOUR tax cuts are going away. TRUMP's tax cuts are in place forever. Anything else you are thinking is "alternate facts".
You may or may not see more back... for the middle class, for a couple of years, some people will see decreased taxes. Some will see increased taxes. However, for sure you will see a tax hike when the cuts disappear (I believe in 8 years). Whereas the tax cuts that benefit the ultra-rich go on forever. Basically it's a cynical way for the politicians to be able to vote for the billiionare benefit w/o taking as much flak.
So this is timely because I inherited a web project that uses a JS framework about a year ago. I'm realizing that the author of the framework (I won't mention which one to avoid extraneous discussion) has moved on a couple of years ago and created a new framework. Now I'm wondering... given that the old framework is working and I've come to grips with it and have a pretty good feel for it, is there really any risk in keeping on with it? I mean, presumably Javascript is going to keep working. It may become archaic or not follow what the cool kids are doing in UI, but I'm not really worried about that. Just how likely is it that it's just going to stop working?