why are you paying incoming call fees again? imagine getting billed on your landline for some fools that call you?
people get double billed, and they still bend over with a smile .
"start with a group/groups that everyone hate(s)"
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Image:Martin-Niemoeller.jpg
pasted from that link
They came first for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.
Then they came for me,
and by that time no one was left to speak up.
"If you want to jerk it to Hannah Montana"
i think this is similar to the tag from movie "traffic" when topher grace was in a car and doign his "hey do you want some drugs" speech... the media pushes this Lolita stuff into general public. Britney, Hannah.. and whoever else. so do you want to see a lolita in skimpy dresses singing your favorite song? why was britney popular, does anyone remember what she looked like in her first music video? its like saying "Hey would you fuck this one?" no? ok next time she'll wear less.
i do like the point about teenagers being sexually actuve... very true... hormones in food make bigger tits on younger girls. and begin to fire off desires too early. do you even see how teenage girls dress? well they might not be sluts, but they do wear a slut's uniform. [officer, officer, help me... -sorry m'am i am not really an officer, just a costume.] and going further.. where do these teens get the clothing? make themselves the short skirt? nope, its the stores that make MONEY on making girls look skimpy, and its in THEIR interest to shove the sex/sexy Lolita look into general media, because as we all know sex sells. then these girls go home and use their newly bought the latest vutest pink phone with a Camera to take naughty photos... yeah?
i think your concern is less about saving anyone, but more about having something to filter. job security? save some kids where? in US? north america as as a whole? south america? the world?
also as far as i understood, filtering also means actively looking for the content to filter. in this case if you filter CP you look for CP to filter, now i wonder do you look at every image (just in case it is CP) or just overall gallery?
moving onto the commercial aspect. i am not sure if you read the news lately about high-school girls sending nudes to their boys and vice versa. so these girls are producers, distributors and 'victims' at the same time? so they would be on the offenders list, yet can visit support groups for abused children:) do you think these girl get abused or do they get off on the thought that the whole school wank off to their bathroom pics? so where is the abuse?
other aspect is that i dont think anyone should tell me, or even decide for me what i should and should not look at or do or think. if i want to look at girl barfing on one another while getting licked by their pets (human or otherwise) thats MY choice and not yours. now you might say is not up to me to decide, but it is, and those that are dying for my freedom will agree with me. and whether the no filtering puts you out of a job well that's service economy for you oh and the 'mind your own business' rule that been around for many centuries.
No sites? No Problem, those who are looking for the CP will go after the real thing or back to what it used to be before internet...
Those sites keep those looking for CP at Home *not your home* their home. they find photos, jerk off and go back to their own business...
if less CP sites will there be less child sex?...as in those step-daughter fantazies wont go away eh Mr. Humbert?
Slashdot Mirror
Apache: releasing last version, 1.3 on death bed.
Nginx: whats apache?
damnit. i never got my Stalin Bobble head doll for +100XP, +5y in Gulag and +3 rad
NOT al INC al rocket-launch.
should read > Nokia will make easier to keep tabs on you. Long live NSA! #1 - I love NSA ! #2 - I love NSA even more !
why are you paying incoming call fees again? imagine getting billed on your landline for some fools that call you? people get double billed, and they still bend over with a smile .
we in Russia make penguin drink, then it turn blue. then we load Alt Linux on it.
how does it go anyone remember? in Soviet Russia... well no one extradites you ! :)
Welcome to Russia. Ahoy Mateys.
where is DrWeb?
so they are saying that my forum captcha and craigslist copy and paste is more secure then the vote verification thing?
can we sink a ship containing the said 14-year olds? or is that not toxic-waste?
IT (eet) is Coming, and its not IT (eye tee) she lucky she has somewhere to sleep in with all these people loosing jobs
just use "Billy Bones". (from treasure island) the bones part is from people loving his system
will be showing his new skillz at 7. does he get to keep or at least name it?
would love to see the machine itself... so they stored it digitally, how? scanning? digital camera? what format?
whatever... Shotgun !
"start with a group/groups that everyone hate(s)"
they started with the Muslims, remember??? !!!
great someone is thinking:
"start with a group/groups that everyone hate(s)" http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Image:Martin-Niemoeller.jpg pasted from that link They came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.
whatcha gonna do about it? i guess its cute seeing USSR come alive once more, just in a different continent.
baby that was born without the gene for breast cancer got breast cancer ~!...more after the /cialis/ commercial break.
Viachelav? Vasja? that you? when you got out?
"If you want to jerk it to Hannah Montana"
i think this is similar to the tag from movie "traffic" when topher grace was in a car and doign his "hey do you want some drugs" speech... the media pushes this Lolita stuff into general public. Britney, Hannah.. and whoever else. so do you want to see a lolita in skimpy dresses singing your favorite song? why was britney popular, does anyone remember what she looked like in her first music video? its like saying "Hey would you fuck this one?" no? ok next time she'll wear less.
i do like the point about teenagers being sexually actuve... very true... hormones in food make bigger tits on younger girls. and begin to fire off desires too early. do you even see how teenage girls dress? well they might not be sluts, but they do wear a slut's uniform. [officer, officer, help me... -sorry m'am i am not really an officer, just a costume.] and going further.. where do these teens get the clothing? make themselves the short skirt? nope, its the stores that make MONEY on making girls look skimpy, and its in THEIR interest to shove the sex/sexy Lolita look into general media, because as we all know sex sells. then these girls go home and use their newly bought the latest vutest pink phone with a Camera to take naughty photos... yeah?
would you be the one pulling the trigger? is the finger itchy?
hint: educate people first.
distribution... hmmmm so the ISP's server's (usernet servers) are trading and distributing CP?
i think your concern is less about saving anyone, but more about having something to filter. job security? save some kids where? in US? north america as as a whole? south america? the world? :) do you think these girl get abused or do they get off on the thought that the whole school wank off to their bathroom pics? so where is the abuse?
also as far as i understood, filtering also means actively looking for the content to filter. in this case if you filter CP you look for CP to filter, now i wonder do you look at every image (just in case it is CP) or just overall gallery?
moving onto the commercial aspect. i am not sure if you read the news lately about high-school girls sending nudes to their boys and vice versa. so these girls are producers, distributors and 'victims' at the same time? so they would be on the offenders list, yet can visit support groups for abused children
other aspect is that i dont think anyone should tell me, or even decide for me what i should and should not look at or do or think. if i want to look at girl barfing on one another while getting licked by their pets (human or otherwise) thats MY choice and not yours. now you might say is not up to me to decide, but it is, and those that are dying for my freedom will agree with me. and whether the no filtering puts you out of a job well that's service economy for you oh and the 'mind your own business' rule that been around for many centuries.
No sites? No Problem, those who are looking for the CP will go after the real thing or back to what it used to be before internet... ...as in those step-daughter fantazies wont go away eh Mr. Humbert?
Those sites keep those looking for CP at Home *not your home* their home. they find photos, jerk off and go back to their own business...
if less CP sites will there be less child sex?