I kind of agree with most people, that this article is pretty shallow and pointless. It's fairly typical, in fact, of cnn.com and that's why I much prefer bbc.co.uk.
It's logical to expect those gadgets that we have today, to decrease significantly in size; whilst at the same time developing more and more features. Look at cellular phones for example. I had my first cell phone about five years ago - looking at it now, it's a BRICK compared to the small nokia 8210 that I now own.
I can't understand why some moron journalist has got paid to write such junk. Talk about stating the obvious!
Slashdot Mirror
no i'm not... what's that got to do with cnn and it's gadgets article though?
I kind of agree with most people, that this article is pretty shallow and pointless. It's fairly typical, in fact, of cnn.com and that's why I much prefer bbc.co.uk. It's logical to expect those gadgets that we have today, to decrease significantly in size; whilst at the same time developing more and more features. Look at cellular phones for example. I had my first cell phone about five years ago - looking at it now, it's a BRICK compared to the small nokia 8210 that I now own. I can't understand why some moron journalist has got paid to write such junk. Talk about stating the obvious!