What's wrong with requiring sites to set a meta tag that indicates they contain pornographic content? (Similar to the movie rating system, except that there would be no official organization that assigns the ratings.) Then make it illegal to contain pornographic content without setting the meta tag.
Wouldn't porn sites want to make it known that they contain porn so that people who want that can find them easier? I would think most sites would want to comply with this, and the ones that don't deserve to be filtered using existing methods.
Slashdot Mirror
What's wrong with requiring sites to set a meta tag that indicates they contain pornographic content? (Similar to the movie rating system, except that there would be no official organization that assigns the ratings.) Then make it illegal to contain pornographic content without setting the meta tag.
Wouldn't porn sites want to make it known that they contain porn so that people who want that can find them easier? I would think most sites would want to comply with this, and the ones that don't deserve to be filtered using existing methods.