Slashdot Mirror


User: angelo-flores

angelo-flores's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1

  1. Re:let's get back to basics on Famous Last Words: You can't decompile a C++ program · · Score: 1
    I don't necessarily see how this problem in VC would affect a standards-compliant compiler; in fact, wouldn't the converse hold true, ie. code that compiles in a standards-compliant compiler would break VC, at least in regard to this kind of scoping? For example:


    for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++)
    ; // ... fun stuff in here

    for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++)
    ; // ... even more fun stuff


    This would compile correctly in a standards-compliant compiler, but VC would complain that this involved some sort of redeclaration of 'i'.

    Now, if I was working in VC and needed to do a quick workaround, couldn't I just wrap these in their own independent set of braces? Or maybe, in a more hackish fashion, declare some sort of macro that attached 'if (true)' to the beginning of 'for' loops? Even if I did the old VC standby, for example:


    int i;
    for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
    ; // ... stuff

    for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
    ; // ... more stuff


    The only code I could imagine that this would break, at least in a standards-compliant compiler, would be code involving a previous declaration of 'i' (before or after this example section of code), but this would also break the code within VC, so it would have been caught beforehand, correct?